Volume 108, Issue 5 November 2023 | | Advertisement The APS Committee on the Status of Women in Physics (CSWP) is now accepting proposals from undergraduate and graduate students who are interested in creating new WiP groups or enhancing existing ones. The deadline for proposals is January 26, 2024. Learn more. | | | | | Not an APS member? Join today to start connecting with a community of more than 50,000 physicists. | | | | Editors' Suggestion Robert Czupryniak, John Steinmetz, Paul G. Kwiat, and Andrew N. Jordan Phys. Rev. A 108, 052408 (2023) – Published 8 November 2023 | The authors propose two optimal phase-estimation schemes that can be used for quantum-enhanced long-baseline interferometry where distributed entanglement eliminates the loss of stellar photons during transmission over the baselines. The schemes can lead to a reduction of both the number of ancilla qubits and the number of gate operations by a factor of two. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion Marta Gilaberte Basset, René Sondenheimer, Jorge Fuenzalida, Andres Vega, Sebastian Töpfer, Elkin A. Santos, Sina Saravi, Frank Setzpfandt, Fabian Steinlechner, and Markus Gräfe Phys. Rev. A 108, 052610 (2023) – Published 20 November 2023 | The authors explore the resolution dependency of imaging with undetected light, specifically the connection between spatial resolution and the strength of position correlations of SPDC-generated photons. Their results show a discrepancy from theoretical models, so they introduce an extended model that better takes image resolution into account. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion Robert M. Potvliege, Adair Nicolson, Matthew P. A. Jones, and Michael Spannowsky Phys. Rev. A 108, 052825 (2023) – Published 29 November 2023 | The authors discuss the use of precise spectroscopic data on hydrogenic atoms in order to obtain new, more stringent bounds on new physics beyond the Standard Model. Assuming a certain "reasonable" flavor dependence the authors obtain constraints that are orders of magnitude more stringent than constraints from hydrogen alone. | | | | | | Featured in Physics Smrithan Ravichandran, Marine Huault, Roberto Lera, Calvin Z. He, Andrew Longman, Robert Fedosejevs, Luis Roso, and Wendell T. Hill, III Phys. Rev. A 108, 053101 (2023) – Published 1 November 2023 | Electrons can help infer laser intensities that are too high to measure using conventional methods. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion Maria Arazo, Montserrat Guilleumas, Ricardo Mayol, Vicente Delgado, and Antonio Muñoz Mateo Phys. Rev. A 108, 053302 (2023) – Published 1 November 2023 | The authors study a quasi-one-dimensional Bose-Einstein condensate in a rotating ring geometry subject to a current nonlinearity. The stability of stationary states is examined both by linear excitation analysis and time evolution of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation with current-density interactions. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion Timur V. Tscherbul and Jose P. D'Incao Phys. Rev. A 108, 053317 (2023) – Published 17 November 2023 | The authors explore an alternative basis set for incorporating the effects of hyperfine structure and external magnetic fields in quantum scattering calculations on ultracold molecular collisions. The basis set combines the computational efficiency of the total-angular-momentum basis with the ease of evaluating matrix elements pertinent to the fully uncoupled basis. | | | | | | Featured in Physics Editors' Suggestion Letter Fang-Fei Wu, Ting-Yun Shi, Wei-Tou Ni, and Li-Yan Tang Phys. Rev. A 108, L051101 (2023) – Published 9 November 2023 | The authors theoretically investigate the impact of Dirac negative-energy states on the E2 and M1 polarizabilities in optical clocks. They demonstrate the importance of negative-energy states for the M1 polarizability and resolve the sign inconsistency between the theoretical calculations and experimental measurements in the E2-M1 polarizability difference of the Sr clock. | | | | | | Featured in Physics Editors' Suggestion Letter S. G. Porsev, M. G. Kozlov, and M. S. Safronova Phys. Rev. A 108, L051102 (2023) – Published 9 November 2023 | An accurate formula for the magnetic-dipole polarizability that takes into account both the positive- and negative-energy-state contributions is presented. The major discrepancy between the theory and experiment is explained. | | | | | | | |
No comments:
Post a Comment