Volume 108, Issue 5 November 2023 | | Advertisement Abstract submissions are officially open for APS April Meeting 2024! Gather your groundbreaking research, from Quarks to Cosmos, to share with the best and brightest in academia, industry, and national labs. Remember, you must be an APS member to submit. Learn more about the abstract submission process. | | | | | Advertisement | Letter Second-order perturbation theory in continuum quantum Monte Carlo calculations Ryan Curry, Joel E. Lynn, Kevin E. Schmidt, and Alexandros Gezerlis Phys. Rev. Research 5, L042021 (2023) – Published 8 November 2023 | |
| | Efficient production of the nuclear isomer 93mMo with laser-accelerated proton beam and its astrophysical implication on 92Mo production Wenru Fan, Wei Qi, Jingli Zhang, Zongwei Cao, Haoyang Lan, Xinxiang Li, Yi Xu, Yuqiu Gu, Zhigang Deng, Zhimeng Zhang, Changxiang Tan, Wen Luo, Yun Yuan, and Weimin Zhou Phys. Rev. Research 5, 043120 (2023) – Published 6 November 2023 | | | Sign up to receive Physical Review Research monthly alerts | | | | Advertisement The APS Committee on the Status of Women in Physics (CSWP) is now accepting proposals from undergraduate and graduate students who are interested in creating new WiP groups or enhancing existing ones. The deadline for proposals is January 26, 2024. Learn more. | | | | | Not an APS member? Join today to start connecting with a community of more than 50,000 physicists. | | | | Editors' Suggestion Zachary Sweger, Saeahram Yoo, Ziyuan Zeng, Daniel Cebra, Spencer R. Klein, Yuanjing Ji, Xin Dong, and Minjung Kim Phys. Rev. C 108, 055205 (2023) – Published 21 November 2023 | High-energy backward scattering of photons can involve very large momentum transfers to the target baryons. This is in stark contrast to the more common forward scattering process which dominates the Compton scattering cross section and is widely recognized as one of the most important measurements in the quest to understand and image the proton and nuclei. The authors present a detailed study of such high-energy virtual Compton back scattering at the future Electron-Ion Collider (EIC). The paper describes new opportunities for obtaining relevant physics information from this particular scattering scenario and highlights the physics potential at the EIC. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion Lorenzo Périssé, Anthony Onillon, Xavier Mougeot, Matthieu Vivier, Thierry Lasserre, Alain Letourneau, David Lhuillier, and Guillaume Mention Phys. Rev. C 108, 055501 (2023) – Published 27 November 2023 | Nuclear reactors are the most copious human-made source of electron antineutrinos (ν̅ e) on Earth; yet, determining their flux and spectrum with accuracy remains a considerable challenge. In fact, measurements of the antineutrino flux from reactors have shown a deficit with respect to predictions, which has become known as the reactor antineutrino anomaly. This work combines a careful analysis of up-to-date nuclear decay data with advanced theoretical corrections to the V-A theory of β decay to produce, for the first time, a flux prediction with a comprehensive uncertainty budget. This new prediction achieves a better agreement with existing experimental neutrino data and methodically pins down points for improvements. It will likely stimulate targeted research to check and improve the experimental inputs, with potentially wide-ranging impact, from weak-interaction physics to many aspects of nuclear reactor science and technology. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion Letter Richard Gumbel, Christian Ross, and A. S. Umar Phys. Rev. C 108, L051602 (2023) – Published 14 November 2023 | Heavy-ion fusion is a major research area, and practical approaches to describe the evolution of the nucleon movement across the barrier between the two nuclei are highly relevant for elucidating the essential dynamics of the fusion process. When two nuclei approach each other to distances where the nuclear force becomes active, neutrons and protons could move from one nucleus to the other. This movement could open and facilitate the pathway to fusion. The authors employ a microscopic many-body approach based on the density-constrained time-dependent Hartree-Fock calculations to study the impact of isospin (i.e., proton versus neutron) dynamics on low-energy nuclear fusion along an isotope chain and its dependence on the deformation of the colliding nuclei. In asymmetric systems, iso-vector dynamics plays a significant role. Its typical effect is a reduction in the potential barrier, which turns into enhancement for neutron-rich systems. These effects could be studied at facilities that provide beams of exotic, unstable nuclei. | | | | | | Letter J. Isaak, D. Savran, N. Pietralla, N. Tsoneva, A. Zilges, K. Eberhardt, C. Geppert, C. Gorges, H. Lenske, and D. Renisch Phys. Rev. C 108, L051301 (2023) – Published 1 November 2023 | | | Letter Moemi Matsumoto, Yusuke Tanimura, and Kouichi Hagino Phys. Rev. C 108, L051302 (2023) – Published 8 November 2023 | | | Letter Aurel Bulgac Phys. Rev. C 108, L051303 (2023) – Published 9 November 2023 | | | Letter W.-L. Lv (吕万里), Y.-F. Niu (牛一斐), D.-L. Fang (房栋梁), J.-M. Yao (尧江明), C.-L. Bai (白春林), and J. Meng (孟杰) Phys. Rev. C 108, L051304 (2023) – Published 22 November 2023 | | | Letter J. Williams et al. Phys. Rev. C 108, L051305 (2023) – Published 27 November 2023 | | | Letter Zhao-Qing Feng Phys. Rev. C 108, L051601 (2023) – Published 13 November 2023 | | | Editors' Suggestion Letter Richard Gumbel, Christian Ross, and A. S. Umar Phys. Rev. C 108, L051602 (2023) – Published 14 November 2023 | Heavy-ion fusion is a major research area, and practical approaches to describe the evolution of the nucleon movement across the barrier between the two nuclei are highly relevant for elucidating the essential dynamics of the fusion process. When two nuclei approach each other to distances where the nuclear force becomes active, neutrons and protons could move from one nucleus to the other. This movement could open and facilitate the pathway to fusion. The authors employ a microscopic many-body approach based on the density-constrained time-dependent Hartree-Fock calculations to study the impact of isospin (i.e., proton versus neutron) dynamics on low-energy nuclear fusion along an isotope chain and its dependence on the deformation of the colliding nuclei. In asymmetric systems, iso-vector dynamics plays a significant role. Its typical effect is a reduction in the potential barrier, which turns into enhancement for neutron-rich systems. These effects could be studied at facilities that provide beams of exotic, unstable nuclei. | | | | | | Letter Pawel Danielewicz, Herbert Ströbele, and Pierre Nzabahimana Phys. Rev. C 108, L051603 (2023) – Published 15 November 2023 | | | Letter C. L. Jiang, W. F. Henning, B. P. Kay, and N. Watwood Phys. Rev. C 108, L051604 (2023) – Published 16 November 2023 | | | Letter C. L. Jiang, W. F. Henning, C. R. Hoffman, B. P. Kay, and N. Watwood Phys. Rev. C 108, L051605 (2023) – Published 16 November 2023 | | | Letter C. Hunt, S. Ahn, J. Bishop, E. Koshchiy, E. Aboud, M. Alcorta, A. Bosh, K. Hahn, S. Han, C. E. Parker, E. C. Pollacco, B. T. Roeder, M. Roosa, S. Upadhyayula, A. S. Volya, and G. V. Rogachev Phys. Rev. C 108, L051606 (2023) – Published 20 November 2023 | | | Letter E. Masha et al. (LUNA collaboration) Phys. Rev. C 108, L052801 (2023) – Published 22 November 2023 | | | Letter Hiroyuki Tajima, Hiroshi Funaki, Yuta Sekino, Nobutoshi Yasutake, and Mamoru Matsuo Phys. Rev. C 108, L052802 (2023) – Published 29 November 2023 | | | Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction, Few-Body Systems | P. R. Casale, J. E. Amaro, E. Ruiz Arriola, and I. Ruiz Simo Phys. Rev. C 108, 054001 (2023) – Published 6 November 2023 | | | Oliver Thim, Eleanor May, Andreas Ekström, and Christian Forssén Phys. Rev. C 108, 054002 (2023) – Published 14 November 2023 | | | Pierre-Yves Duerinck, Rimantas Lazauskas, and Jérémy Dohet-Eraly Phys. Rev. C 108, 054003 (2023) – Published 17 November 2023 | | | Hiroyuki Fujioka, Ryutaro Tomomatsu, and Koichi Takamiya Phys. Rev. C 108, 054004 (2023) – Published 22 November 2023 | | | R. Seutin, O. J. Hernandez, T. Miyagi, S. Bacca, K. Hebeler, S. König, and A. Schwenk Phys. Rev. C 108, 054005 (2023) – Published 27 November 2023 | | | D. A. Nesterenko et al. Phys. Rev. C 108, 054301 (2023) – Published 1 November 2023 | | | V. Karayonchev, J. Jolie, D. Bittner, M. Beckers, A. Esmaylzadeh, J. Fischer, C. Fransen, J. Garbe, L. Knafla, C.-D. Lakenbrink, and M. Ley Phys. Rev. C 108, 054302 (2023) – Published 2 November 2023 | | | G. H. Sargsyan, K. D. Launey, R. M. Shaffer, S. T. Marley, N. Dudeck, A. Mercenne, T. Dytrych, and J. P. Draayer Phys. Rev. C 108, 054303 (2023) – Published 7 November 2023 | | | C. R. Ding, X. Zhang, J. M. Yao, P. Ring, and J. Meng Phys. Rev. C 108, 054304 (2023) – Published 9 November 2023 | | | Ante Ravlić, Esra Yüksel, Tamara Nikšić, and Nils Paar Phys. Rev. C 108, 054305 (2023) – Published 13 November 2023 | | | H. M. Dai, Q. B. Chen, and Xian-Rong Zhou Phys. Rev. C 108, 054306 (2023) – Published 14 November 2023 | | | Joshua Cesca and Cédric Simenel Phys. Rev. C 108, 054307 (2023) – Published 15 November 2023 | | | Y. Omura, H. Nakada, K. Abe, and M. Takahashi Phys. Rev. C 108, 054308 (2023) – Published 15 November 2023 | | | Chenyi Gu, Z. H. Sun, G. Hagen, and T. Papenbrock Phys. Rev. C 108, 054309 (2023) – Published 15 November 2023 | | | Jordan M. R. Fox, Calvin W. Johnson, and Rodrigo Navarro Perez Phys. Rev. C 108, 054310 (2023) – Published 17 November 2023 | | | Mário B. Amaro, Daniel Karlsson, and Chong Qi Phys. Rev. C 108, 054311 (2023) – Published 20 November 2023 | | | D. S. Hou et al. Phys. Rev. C 108, 054312 (2023) – Published 27 November 2023 | | | Fan Gao, Zi-Rui Chen, and Long-Jun Wang Phys. Rev. C 108, 054313 (2023) – Published 27 November 2023 | | | Yu-Ting Rong Phys. Rev. C 108, 054314 (2023) – Published 30 November 2023 | | | M. R. Cortes, V. A. B. Zagatto, J. L. Ferreira, J. Rangel, L. F. Canto, and J. Lubian Phys. Rev. C 108, 054601 (2023) – Published 7 November 2023 | | | C. A. Bertulani Phys. Rev. C 108, 054602 (2023) – Published 13 November 2023 | | | A. M. Mukhamedzhanov Phys. Rev. C 108, 054603 (2023) – Published 14 November 2023 | | | Zhaoyang Li and Tao Yang Phys. Rev. C 108, 054604 (2023) – Published 17 November 2023 | | | S. Ayik, M. Arik, E. Erbayri, O. Yilmaz, and A. S. Umar Phys. Rev. C 108, 054605 (2023) – Published 20 November 2023 | | | V. N. Orlin and K. A. Stopani Phys. Rev. C 108, 054606 (2023) – Published 20 November 2023 | | | S. Tanaka (田中翔也), N. Nishimura (西村信哉), F. Minato (湊太志), and Y. Aritomo (有友嘉浩) Phys. Rev. C 108, 054607 (2023) – Published 21 November 2023 | | | K. Miernik et al. Phys. Rev. C 108, 054608 (2023) – Published 22 November 2023 | | | Sangeeta Dhuri, K. Mahata, K. Ramachandran, P. C. Rout, A. Shrivastava, S. K. Pandit, V. V. Parkar, Shilpi Gupta, V. V. Desai, A. Kumar, E. T. Mirgule, B. K. Nayak, and A. Saxena Phys. Rev. C 108, 054609 (2023) – Published 27 November 2023 | | | Y. Huang, X. Y. Wu, X. L. Tu, Z. P. Li, Y. Kuang, J. T. Zhang, and Z. H. Li Phys. Rev. C 108, 054610 (2023) – Published 27 November 2023 | | | C. Ciampi et al. (INDRA-FAZIA Collaboration) Phys. Rev. C 108, 054611 (2023) – Published 28 November 2023 | | | Sh. A. Kalandarov, G. G. Adamian, and N. V. Antonenko Phys. Rev. C 108, 054612 (2023) – Published 29 November 2023 | | | Z. Gao, A. Solders, A. Al-Adili, S. Cannarozzo, M. Lantz, S. Pomp, O. Beliuskina, T. Eronen, S. Geldhof, A. Kankainen, I. D. Moore, D. Nesterenko, and H. Penttilä (IGISOL Collaboration) Phys. Rev. C 108, 054613 (2023) – Published 30 November 2023 | | | Relativistic Nuclear Collisions | Mayank Singh, Manu Kurian, Sangyong Jeon, and Charles Gale Phys. Rev. C 108, 054901 (2023) – Published 7 November 2023 | | | Xin-Li Sheng, Shi Pu, and Qun Wang Phys. Rev. C 108, 054902 (2023) – Published 13 November 2023 | | | Margaret E. Carrington, Wade N. Cowie, Bryce T. Friesen, Stanisław Mrówczyński, and Doug Pickering Phys. Rev. C 108, 054903 (2023) – Published 13 November 2023 | | | N. Buyukcizmeci, T. Reichert, A. S. Botvina, and M. Bleicher Phys. Rev. C 108, 054904 (2023) – Published 16 November 2023 | | | Dananjaya Liyanage, Özge Sürer, Matthew Plumlee, Stefan M. Wild, and Ulrich Heinz Phys. Rev. C 108, 054905 (2023) – Published 20 November 2023 | | | Jiaxuan Luo, Xinbai Li, Zebo Tang, Xin Wu, and Wangmei Zha Phys. Rev. C 108, 054906 (2023) – Published 27 November 2023 | | | Q. Hu, G. Y. Tian, R. Wada, X. Q. Liu, W. P. Lin, H. Zheng, Y. P. Zhang, Z. Q. Chen, R. Han, and M. R. Huang Phys. Rev. C 108, 054907 (2023) – Published 28 November 2023 | | | Taesoo Song, Joerg Aichelin, Jiaxing Zhao, Pol Bernard Gossiaux, and Elena Bratkovskaya Phys. Rev. C 108, 054908 (2023) – Published 29 November 2023 | | | Kristian Piscicchia et al. Phys. Rev. C 108, 055201 (2023) – Published 6 November 2023 | | | Jaseer Ahmed, P. G. Blunden, and W. Melnitchouk Phys. Rev. C 108, 055202 (2023) – Published 14 November 2023 | | | S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration) Phys. Rev. C 108, 055203 (2023) – Published 14 November 2023 | | | S. Adhikari et al. (GlueX Collaboration) Phys. Rev. C 108, 055204 (2023) – Published 15 November 2023 | | | Editors' Suggestion Zachary Sweger, Saeahram Yoo, Ziyuan Zeng, Daniel Cebra, Spencer R. Klein, Yuanjing Ji, Xin Dong, and Minjung Kim Phys. Rev. C 108, 055205 (2023) – Published 21 November 2023 | High-energy backward scattering of photons can involve very large momentum transfers to the target baryons. This is in stark contrast to the more common forward scattering process which dominates the Compton scattering cross section and is widely recognized as one of the most important measurements in the quest to understand and image the proton and nuclei. The authors present a detailed study of such high-energy virtual Compton back scattering at the future Electron-Ion Collider (EIC). The paper describes new opportunities for obtaining relevant physics information from this particular scattering scenario and highlights the physics potential at the EIC. | | | | | | Yuk Kei Kong, Takuya Minamikawa, and Masayasu Harada Phys. Rev. C 108, 055206 (2023) – Published 22 November 2023 | | | Electroweak Interaction, Symmetries | Editors' Suggestion Lorenzo Périssé, Anthony Onillon, Xavier Mougeot, Matthieu Vivier, Thierry Lasserre, Alain Letourneau, David Lhuillier, and Guillaume Mention Phys. Rev. C 108, 055501 (2023) – Published 27 November 2023 | Nuclear reactors are the most copious human-made source of electron antineutrinos (ν̅ e) on Earth; yet, determining their flux and spectrum with accuracy remains a considerable challenge. In fact, measurements of the antineutrino flux from reactors have shown a deficit with respect to predictions, which has become known as the reactor antineutrino anomaly. This work combines a careful analysis of up-to-date nuclear decay data with advanced theoretical corrections to the V-A theory of β decay to produce, for the first time, a flux prediction with a comprehensive uncertainty budget. This new prediction achieves a better agreement with existing experimental neutrino data and methodically pins down points for improvements. It will likely stimulate targeted research to check and improve the experimental inputs, with potentially wide-ranging impact, from weak-interaction physics to many aspects of nuclear reactor science and technology. | | | | | | Ilona Bednarek, Jan Sładkowski, Jacek Syska, and Wiesław Olchawa Phys. Rev. C 108, 055801 (2023) – Published 1 November 2023 | | | Sunil Kumar, Mukul Kumar, Raj Kumar, and Shashi K. Dhiman Phys. Rev. C 108, 055802 (2023) – Published 15 November 2023 | | | Jake Richter and Bao-An Li Phys. Rev. C 108, 055803 (2023) – Published 20 November 2023 | | | L. Liu (刘雷), S. Y. Wang (王守宇), Z. Q. Chen (陈志强), C. Liu (刘晨), B. Qi (亓斌), D. P. Sun (孙大鹏), S. Wang (王硕), Q. An (安强), C. J. Xu (徐长江), P. Zhang (张盼), Z. Q. Li (李志泉), C. Y. Niu (牛晨阳), X. G. Wu (吴晓光), G. S. Li (李广生), C. Y. He (贺创业), Y. Zheng (郑云), C. B. Li (李聪博), S. H. Yao (姚顺和), S. P. Hu (胡世鹏), H. W. Li (李红伟), J. J. Liu (刘嘉健), and J. L. Wang (汪金龙) Phys. Rev. C 108, 059901 (2023) – Published 6 November 2023 | | | | |
No comments:
Post a Comment