Volume 19, Issue 3 March 2023 | | Advertisement APS is seeking nominations for all APS Honors, recognizing outstanding achievements in physics. Nominate a colleague for APS Fellowship, Prizes, and Awards. They are open to all members of the scientific community. Please consider nominating deserving colleagues. Learn more. | | | | | Not an APS member? Join today to start connecting with a community of more than 50,000 physicists. | | | | Featured in Physics Shengli Chen, Tianxiang Wang, Zhong Zhang, Runfeng Li, Su Yuan, Ruiyi Zhang, Cenxi Yuan, Chunyu Zhang, and Jianyu Zhu Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034028 (2023) – Published 9 March 2023 | A new set of diagnostic techniques developed from experimental data will improve authorities' ability to determine the provenance of spent fuel. | | | | | | Featured in Physics Weikun Tian, Wen Jun Wee, An Qu, Billy Jun Ming Lim, Prithvi Raj Datla, Vanessa Pei Wen Koh, and Huanqian Loh Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034048 (2023) – Published 15 March 2023 | A new algorithm can organize hundreds of atoms into pristine patterns—including a honeycomb lattice, a fractal called a Sierpiński triangle, and a lion's head. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion R. Rouzegar, A.L. Chekhov, Y. Behovits, B.R. Serrano, M.A. Syskaki, C.H. Lambert, D. Engel, U. Martens, M. Münzenberg, M. Wolf, G. Jakob, M. Kläui, T.S. Seifert, and T. Kampfrath Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034018 (2023) – Published 6 March 2023 | Spintronic terahertz emitters (STEs) are desirable broadband terahertz sources, but their limited signal strength has hindered practical application. By optimizing the photonic and thermal environment, the authors present an STE that could overcome this obstacle. Benchmarking against the state-of-the-art terahertz emitters based on optical rectification, this STE delivers strong terahertz pulses with comparable peak electric field and fluence, and offers additional features such as broadband radiation, easy alignment, and rotation of the terahertz polarization plane without power loss. This work will open up a promising pathway to nonlinear terahertz spectroscopy with spintronic sources. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion Dmytro Kolisnyk and Gernot Schaller Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034023 (2023) – Published 8 March 2023 | One of the world's tiniest autonomous refrigerators can be realized by a single qutrit coupled to three thermal reservoirs. The authors analyze the performance of multiple collectively coupled qutrits, and observe a quantum boost in the steady-state cooling current with a quadratic scaling in the working fluid size. With additional interqutrit interactions, the quantum boost can be maintained also for larger systems and not perfectly collective scenarios, enabling efficient quantum cooling. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion Shravan Kumar Parthasarathy, Birgit Kallinger, Florian Kaiser, Patrick Berwian, Durga B.R. Dasari, Jochen Friedrich, and Roland Nagy Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034026 (2023) – Published 8 March 2023 | A distributed quantum network requires versatile and high-fidelity quantum memory nodes, but it remains challenging to make them scalable. This study investigates the use of multiple controllable quantum memories in silicon carbide—an established semiconductor material platform for various quantum technology applications—and provides a viable solution. The authors show that solid-state spins in silicon carbide are ideal quantum memories in a distributed quantum computing network, wherein a controlled generation of highly coherent qubit registers using nuclear spins is possible. This study will impact the future development of quantum networks with solid states spins as quantum memories. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion Jacob Bryon, D.K. Weiss, Xinyuan You, Sara Sussman, Xanthe Croot, Ziwen Huang, Jens Koch, and Andrew A. Houck Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034031 (2023) – Published 9 March 2023 | Time-dependent external flux is ubiquitous across circuit quantum electrodynamics and calls for accurate modeling. Contrary to long-held belief, it is recently predicted—but not yet verified—that the allocation of time-dependent flux cannot be arbitrary in the Hamiltonian. This study provides an experimental verification of this prediction by applying fast flux pulses to a fluxonium qubit and taking measurements of the quantum state following the pulses. Given the widespread use of time-dependent flux in experiments with superconducting qubits, verification of this theory is critical to our understanding of circuit quantum electrodynamics. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion C.W. Johnson, A.K. Schmid, M. Mankos, R. Röpke, N. Kerker, I.S. Hwang, E.K. Wong, D.F. Ogletree, A.M. Minor, and A. Stibor Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034036 (2023) – Published 10 March 2023 | Electron-beam sources are foundational in high-resolution electron microscopy and spectroscopy, but applications have been limited due to their relatively large energy spread. The authors fabricate a monocrystalline niobium nanotip electron field emitter and characterize it in superconducting and normal-conducting regimes. This bright, stable, coherent electron beam source features an exceptionally narrow energy spread. The authors also study the role of xenon adsorption and two-electron correlations. This work may improve aberration-corrected microscopy and electron energy-loss spectroscopy and enable high-resolution vibrational spectroscopy or quantum electron microscopy. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion Alexander P. Read, Benjamin J. Chapman, Chan U Lei, Jacob C. Curtis, Suhas Ganjam, Lev Krayzman, Luigi Frunzio, and Robert J. Schoelkopf Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034064 (2023) – Published 20 March 2023 | To better understand decoherence in superconducting qubits, the authors develop a technique to measure the loss tangent of dielectric substrates and predict the impact of dielectric loss on qubit lifetimes. This is done with no need to fabricate planar devices; the technique is independent of material platform. Measurements of sapphire in a demonstration of the approach suggest that coherence of superconducting qubits on a common form of sapphire is limited significantly by bulk dielectric loss. The same technique also shows that another form of sapphire would substantially mitigate this bulk dielectric loss and prolong qubit coherence. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion Jihun Lim and Stephen R. Forrest Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034099 (2023) – Published 31 March 2023 | As the energy economy becomes increasingly decarbonized, low-cost energy storage grows ever more important. Thermal batteries in combination with thermophotovoltaic (TPV) cells are one major source of storage. The lowest-loss TPV cells utilize an air bridge (AB) with a gold back reflector. In this work, the authors determine a 55.5% thermodynamic efficiency limit for AB-TPVs at an emitter temperature of 1400 K, based on detailed balance. Including losses from nonradiative recombination, finite resistance, and free-carrier absorption, the practical efficiency limit is 48.6%. This work provides a road map for evaluating and limiting losses, leading to even higher AB-TPV efficiencies. | | | | | | Letter Hiroki Takesue, Yasuhiro Yamada, Kensuke Inaba, Takuya Ikuta, Yuya Yonezu, Takahiro Inagaki, Toshimori Honjo, Takushi Kazama, Koji Enbutsu, Takeshi Umeki, and Ryoichi Kasahara Phys. Rev. Applied 19, L031001 (2023) – Published 1 March 2023 | Here researchers investigate how well a coherent Ising machine (CIM), based on a network of degenerate optical parametric oscillators, simulates the thermodynamic properties of a two-dimensional square-lattice Ising model. Assuming that the CIM samples can be regarded as a canonical ensemble, the authors estimate the effective temperature of spins (optical pulses) using maximum-likelihood estimation. Using that temperature, the thermodynamic quantities obtained from the CIM exhibit phase-transition-like behavior that matches analytical and numerical results better than what the mean-field approximation produces. This result shows the promise of physical thermodynamics simulators. | | | | | | Letter Zhen Hao, Biqiang Jiang, Yuxin Ma, Ruixuan Yi, Hanyu Jin, Leijia Huang, Xuetao Gan, and Jianlin Zhao Phys. Rev. Applied 19, L031002 (2023) – Published 7 March 2023 | Nonlinear parametric processes in optical fibers provide opportunities to expand advanced fiber-based technologies of lasers, communications, and sensors, but their efficiencies are significantly degraded by phase mismatching. This study proposes a strategy to accurately control the phase matching of optical harmonic generations in a microfiber, by applying a mechanical strain that modifies its structure and refractive index. This effective strategy to optimize nonlinear processes will be beneficial to all-fiber nonlinear optics and could extend their applications in optical communications and signal processing. | | | | | | Letter S. Funada, Y. Ishikawa, M. Kimata, K. Hayashi, T. Sano, K. Sugi, Y. Fujii, S. Mitsudo, Y. Shiota, T. Ono, and T. Moriyama Phys. Rev. Applied 19, L031003 (2023) – Published 16 March 2023 | The ultrahigh-frequency magnetization dynamics of antiferromagnets and ferrimagnets is a key property that could be exploited for terahertz technology and spintronics. Despite recent advances in measuring bulk samples, no techniques have been available to characterize such fast dynamics in the thin films that are important for devices. In this Letter the authors use a gyrotron to demonstrate electrical detection of subterahertz magnetization dynamics in thin films, revealing peculiar antiferromagnetic behavior in Gd-Co. | | | | | | Letter Zhiran Zhang, Maxime Joos, Dolev Bluvstein, Yuanqi Lyu, and Ania C. Bleszynski Jayich Phys. Rev. Applied 19, L031004 (2023) – Published 16 March 2023 | The detection of fluctuating electromagnetic fields through single-spin relaxometry affords important insight into the dynamics of solid-state systems and chemical processes, but its sensitivity is often limited by the proximity of the sensor spin to the target. This study proposes the use of an auxiliary reporter spin to improve sensitivity by as much as a factor of 100, and experimentally verifies the method with a single shallow nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond. This work motivates the development of engineered spin systems as relaxation sensors without the need for optical initialization or readout. | | | | | | Letter S.E. Thomas, S. Sagona-Stophel, Z. Schofield, I.A. Walmsley, and P.M. Ledingham Phys. Rev. Applied 19, L031005 (2023) – Published 16 March 2023 | Tomorrow's quantum Internet will be powered by light and will work over today's telecommunication infrastructure, so we need low-noise, high-bandwidth, telecom-band quantum optical memory to enable scaling in the presence of loss and quantum operations. The authors have built such a device, using coherent two-photon absorption in warm rubidium vapor. This quantum memory stores gigahertz-bandwidth telecom-band light pulses with mean photon number less than one, and retrieves them with a signal-to-noise ratio exceeding 104. This makes possible ultrahigh-fidelity storage of single-photon qubits and is compatible with quantum-dot light sources, for hybridized quantum photonic networking. | | | | | | Letter R. Shaniv, S. Kumar Keshava, C. Reetz, and C.A. Regal Phys. Rev. Applied 19, L031006 (2023) – Published 29 March 2023 | Mass-loaded tensioned microresonators are important in mass-dependent applications like inertial sensing and fundamental research in e.g. quantum gravity, as they combine superb displacement detection with low mechanical dissipation. However, loading a resonator often changes its mode structure and enhances its mechanical loss. The authors study the effect of loading on mode quality factor, varying the load from much smaller to larger than the resonator's total mass. Surprisingly, the quality factor becomes independent of the mass in the large-load regime, which explains previous related results and provides fresh perspective for design. | | | | | | Uday Saha, James D. Siverns, John Hannegan, Mihika Prabhu, Qudsia Quraishi, Dirk Englund, and Edo Waks Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034001 (2023) – Published 1 March 2023 | | | Bing Luo, Ruiling Gao, Yin Wang, Heng Gao, Junjie Liu, and Wei Ren Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034002 (2023) – Published 1 March 2023 | | | P. Welter, B.A. Jósteinsson, S. Josephy, A. Wittmann, A. Morales, G. Puebla-Hellmann, and C.L. Degen Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034003 (2023) – Published 1 March 2023 | | | Tan-Lien Pham, Woon Ih Choi, Aamir Shafique, Hye Jung Kim, Munbo Shim, Kyoungmin Min, Won-Joon Son, Inkook Jang, Dae Sin Kim, Mauro Boero, Carlo Massobrio, Guido Ori, Hyo Sug Lee, and Young-Han Shin Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034004 (2023) – Published 1 March 2023 | | | David M. Paganin, Morten Sales, Peter M. Kadletz, Winfried Kockelmann, Mario A. Beltran, Henning F. Poulsen, and Søren Schmidt Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034005 (2023) – Published 2 March 2023 | | | Oscar Bulancea-Lindvall, Matthew T. Eiles, Nguyen Tien Son, Igor A. Abrikosov, and Viktor Ivády Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034006 (2023) – Published 2 March 2023 | | | Kevin Kouwenhoven, Daniel Fan, Enrico Biancalani, Steven A.H. de Rooij, Tawab Karim, Carlas S. Smith, Vignesh Murugesan, David J. Thoen, Jochem J.A. Baselmans, and Pieter J. de Visser Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034007 (2023) – Published 2 March 2023 | | | K. Muhammed Shafi, Ramachandrarao Yalla, and Kali P. Nayak Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034008 (2023) – Published 2 March 2023 | | | Joe Bentley, Hendra Nurdin, Yanbei Chen, Xiang Li, and Haixing Miao Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034009 (2023) – Published 2 March 2023 | | | Tanjung Krisnanda, Kevin Dini, Huawen Xu, Wouter Verstraelen, and Timothy C.H. Liew Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034010 (2023) – Published 3 March 2023 | | | Aleksei R. Matanin, Konstantin I. Gerasimov, Eugene S. Moiseev, Nikita S. Smirnov, Anton I. Ivanov, Elizaveta I. Malevannaya, Victor I. Polozov, Eugeny V. Zikiy, Andrey A. Samoilov, Ilya A. Rodionov, and Sergey A. Moiseev Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034011 (2023) – Published 3 March 2023 | | | H. Y. Poh, C. C. I. Ang, G. J. Lim, T. L. Jin, S. H. Lee, E. K. Koh, F. Poh, and W. S. Lew Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034012 (2023) – Published 3 March 2023 | | | Mariano Pascale and Georgia T. Papadakis Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034013 (2023) – Published 3 March 2023 | | | Gui Wang, Zhuang Ma, Jing-Wen Jiang, Jing-kai Yang, Yi-Ling Sun, Zheng-Fang Qian, Pu Huang, Peng Zhang, and Su-Huai Wei Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034014 (2023) – Published 3 March 2023 | | | Dong Hwan Kim, Su-Yong Lee, Zaeill Kim, Taek Jeong, and Duk Y. Kim Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034015 (2023) – Published 6 March 2023 | | | Madhusoodhanan Lathika Divya, Yun-Sung Lee, and Vanchiappan Aravindan Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034016 (2023) – Published 6 March 2023 | | | Zhan Yu, Xuanqiang Zhao, Benchi Zhao, and Xin Wang Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034017 (2023) – Published 6 March 2023 | | | Editors' Suggestion R. Rouzegar, A.L. Chekhov, Y. Behovits, B.R. Serrano, M.A. Syskaki, C.H. Lambert, D. Engel, U. Martens, M. Münzenberg, M. Wolf, G. Jakob, M. Kläui, T.S. Seifert, and T. Kampfrath Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034018 (2023) – Published 6 March 2023 | Spintronic terahertz emitters (STEs) are desirable broadband terahertz sources, but their limited signal strength has hindered practical application. By optimizing the photonic and thermal environment, the authors present an STE that could overcome this obstacle. Benchmarking against the state-of-the-art terahertz emitters based on optical rectification, this STE delivers strong terahertz pulses with comparable peak electric field and fluence, and offers additional features such as broadband radiation, easy alignment, and rotation of the terahertz polarization plane without power loss. This work will open up a promising pathway to nonlinear terahertz spectroscopy with spintronic sources. | | | | | | Karthik V. Myilswamy, Suparna Seshadri, Hsuan-Hao Lu, Mohammed S. Alshaykh, Junqiu Liu, Tobias J. Kippenberg, Andrew M. Weiner, and Joseph M. Lukens Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034019 (2023) – Published 7 March 2023 | | | Rongxin Li, Xiaojuan Yuan, Zhenhua Zhang, Qian Chen, Zhongming Zeng, Zhihong Lu, Ke Wang, Yong Liu, and Rui Xiong Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034020 (2023) – Published 7 March 2023 | | | William M. Strickland, Bassel Heiba Elfeky, Joseph O'Connell Yuan, William F. Schiela, Peng Yu, Dylan Langone, Maxim G. Vavilov, Vladimir E. Manucharyan, and Javad Shabani Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034021 (2023) – Published 7 March 2023 | | | Zi-Huai Zhang, Andrew M. Edmonds, Nicola Palmer, Matthew L. Markham, and Nathalie P. de Leon Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034022 (2023) – Published 7 March 2023 | | | Editors' Suggestion Dmytro Kolisnyk and Gernot Schaller Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034023 (2023) – Published 8 March 2023 | One of the world's tiniest autonomous refrigerators can be realized by a single qutrit coupled to three thermal reservoirs. The authors analyze the performance of multiple collectively coupled qutrits, and observe a quantum boost in the steady-state cooling current with a quadratic scaling in the working fluid size. With additional interqutrit interactions, the quantum boost can be maintained also for larger systems and not perfectly collective scenarios, enabling efficient quantum cooling. | | | | | | M. Khalifa and J. Salfi Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034024 (2023) – Published 8 March 2023 | | | I.A. Golovchanskiy, N.N. Abramov, O.V. Emelyanova, I.V. Shchetinin, V.V. Ryazanov, A.A. Golubov, and V.S. Stolyarov Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034025 (2023) – Published 8 March 2023 | | | Editors' Suggestion Shravan Kumar Parthasarathy, Birgit Kallinger, Florian Kaiser, Patrick Berwian, Durga B.R. Dasari, Jochen Friedrich, and Roland Nagy Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034026 (2023) – Published 8 March 2023 | A distributed quantum network requires versatile and high-fidelity quantum memory nodes, but it remains challenging to make them scalable. This study investigates the use of multiple controllable quantum memories in silicon carbide—an established semiconductor material platform for various quantum technology applications—and provides a viable solution. The authors show that solid-state spins in silicon carbide are ideal quantum memories in a distributed quantum computing network, wherein a controlled generation of highly coherent qubit registers using nuclear spins is possible. This study will impact the future development of quantum networks with solid states spins as quantum memories. | | | | | | Xiao-Hai Zhan, Shuang Wang, Zhen-Qiu Zhong, Zhen-Qiang Yin, Wei Chen, De-Yong He, Guang-Can Guo, and Zheng-Fu Han Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034027 (2023) – Published 8 March 2023 | | | Featured in Physics Shengli Chen, Tianxiang Wang, Zhong Zhang, Runfeng Li, Su Yuan, Ruiyi Zhang, Cenxi Yuan, Chunyu Zhang, and Jianyu Zhu Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034028 (2023) – Published 9 March 2023 | A new set of diagnostic techniques developed from experimental data will improve authorities' ability to determine the provenance of spent fuel. | | | | | | Gabriele Barrera, Paolo Allia, and Paola Tiberto Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034029 (2023) – Published 9 March 2023 | | | Zheng-Meng Zhai, Mohammadamin Moradi, Ling-Wei Kong, and Ying-Cheng Lai Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034030 (2023) – Published 9 March 2023 | | | Editors' Suggestion Jacob Bryon, D.K. Weiss, Xinyuan You, Sara Sussman, Xanthe Croot, Ziwen Huang, Jens Koch, and Andrew A. Houck Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034031 (2023) – Published 9 March 2023 | Time-dependent external flux is ubiquitous across circuit quantum electrodynamics and calls for accurate modeling. Contrary to long-held belief, it is recently predicted—but not yet verified—that the allocation of time-dependent flux cannot be arbitrary in the Hamiltonian. This study provides an experimental verification of this prediction by applying fast flux pulses to a fluxonium qubit and taking measurements of the quantum state following the pulses. Given the widespread use of time-dependent flux in experiments with superconducting qubits, verification of this theory is critical to our understanding of circuit quantum electrodynamics. | | | | | | Xudong Fan, Yifan Zhu, Zihao Su, Ning Li, Xiaolong Huang, Yang Kang, Can Li, Chunsheng Weng, Hui Zhang, Weiwei Kan, and Badreddine Assouar Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034032 (2023) – Published 9 March 2023 | | | Shengxin Yang, Liang Ding, Shuai Wang, Chen Du, Longcheng Feng, Hongsong Qiu, Caihong Zhang, Jingbo Wu, Kebin Fan, Biaobing Jin, Jian Chen, and Peiheng Wu Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034033 (2023) – Published 10 March 2023 | | | Christopher M. Pierce, Daniel B. Durham, Fabrizio Riminucci, Scott Dhuey, Ivan Bazarov, Jared Maxson, Andrew M. Minor, and Daniele Filippetto Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034034 (2023) – Published 10 March 2023 | | | Kenta Kato, Tomohiro Yokoyama, and Hajime Ishihara Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034035 (2023) – Published 10 March 2023 | | | Editors' Suggestion C.W. Johnson, A.K. Schmid, M. Mankos, R. Röpke, N. Kerker, I.S. Hwang, E.K. Wong, D.F. Ogletree, A.M. Minor, and A. Stibor Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034036 (2023) – Published 10 March 2023 | Electron-beam sources are foundational in high-resolution electron microscopy and spectroscopy, but applications have been limited due to their relatively large energy spread. The authors fabricate a monocrystalline niobium nanotip electron field emitter and characterize it in superconducting and normal-conducting regimes. This bright, stable, coherent electron beam source features an exceptionally narrow energy spread. The authors also study the role of xenon adsorption and two-electron correlations. This work may improve aberration-corrected microscopy and electron energy-loss spectroscopy and enable high-resolution vibrational spectroscopy or quantum electron microscopy. | | | | | | Xin Huang, Christopher Yeung, and Aaswath P. Raman Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034037 (2023) – Published 10 March 2023 | | | Shubhayan Sarkar, Jakub J. Borkała, Chellasamy Jebarathinam, Owidiusz Makuta, Debashis Saha, and Remigiusz Augusiak Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034038 (2023) – Published 13 March 2023 | | | Guoyi Shi, Fei Wang, Hui Ru Tan, Shishun Zhao, Yakun Liu, Dongsheng Yang, Kyusup Lee, Yuchen Pu, Shuhan Yang, Anjan Soumyanarayanan, and Hyunsoo Yang Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034039 (2023) – Published 13 March 2023 | | | Xiu Liu, Hakan Salihoglu, Xiao Luo, Zexiao Wang, Hyeong Seok Yun, Lin Jing, Bowen Yu, and Sheng Shen Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034040 (2023) – Published 13 March 2023 | | | Marko Šimić, Christian Hill, and Ulrich Hohenester Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034041 (2023) – Published 13 March 2023 | | | Fei Lin, Ling Hong, Yuan Ren, Xiaodong Qiu, and Lixiang Chen Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034042 (2023) – Published 13 March 2023 | | | Xuming Luo, Xiao Wang, Jinwu Wei, Wenlong Yang, Mingkun Zhao, Yizhan Wang, Yuqiang Wang, Wenqing He, Bin He, Zhongming Zeng, Caihua Wan, Xiufeng Han, and Guoqiang Yu Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034043 (2023) – Published 14 March 2023 | | | Gui-Long Jiang, Wen-Qiang Liu, and Hai-Rui Wei Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034044 (2023) – Published 14 March 2023 | | | Hui Zhang, Zengtai Zhu, Yungu Zhu, Xiaobing Chen, Qisheng Jiang, Jinwu Wei, Chenbo Zhao, Jine Zhang, Furong Han, Huaiwen Yang, Dapeng Zhu, Hao Wu, Yuansha Chen, Fengxia Hu, Baogen Shen, Weisheng Zhao, Jing Zhang, Guoqiang Yu, and Jirong Sun Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034045 (2023) – Published 14 March 2023 | | | Hailang Dai, Hong Yang, Zhuangqi Cao, and Xianfeng Chen Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034046 (2023) – Published 14 March 2023 | | | Ryosho Nakane, Akira Hirose, and Gouhei Tanaka Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034047 (2023) – Published 14 March 2023 | | | Featured in Physics Weikun Tian, Wen Jun Wee, An Qu, Billy Jun Ming Lim, Prithvi Raj Datla, Vanessa Pei Wen Koh, and Huanqian Loh Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034048 (2023) – Published 15 March 2023 | A new algorithm can organize hundreds of atoms into pristine patterns—including a honeycomb lattice, a fractal called a Sierpiński triangle, and a lion's head. | | | | | | Xin Tong, Zhe He, Yide Zhang, Samuel Solomon, Li Lin, Qiyuan Song, and Lihong V. Wang Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034049 (2023) – Published 15 March 2023 | | | Samuel C. Smith, Benjamin J. Brown, and Stephen D. Bartlett Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034050 (2023) – Published 15 March 2023 | | | Shreyasi Das, Arup Ghorai, Sourabh Pal, Somnath Mahato, Soumen Das, and Samit K. Ray Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034051 (2023) – Published 15 March 2023 | | | Jiaqing Jiang and Xin Wang Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034052 (2023) – Published 15 March 2023 | | | Zachary Morrell, Marc Vuffray, Andrey Y. Lokhov, Andreas Bärtschi, Tameem Albash, and Carleton Coffrin Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034053 (2023) – Published 16 March 2023 | | | J.M. Llorens and B. Alén Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034054 (2023) – Published 16 March 2023 | | | K.J. Kihlstrom, K.C. Reddy, S. Elghazoly, T.E. Sharma, A.E. Koshelev, U. Welp, Y. Hao, R. Divan, M. Tsujimoto, K. Kadowaki, W.-K. Kwok, and T.M. Benseman Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034055 (2023) – Published 17 March 2023 | | | Navdeep Rana and Gopal Dixit Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034056 (2023) – Published 17 March 2023 | | | Elihu Anouchi, Tony Yamin, and Amos Sharoni Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034057 (2023) – Published 17 March 2023 | | | Alexander C.B. Greenwood, Larry T.H. Wu, Eric Y. Zhu, Brian T. Kirby, and Li Qian Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034058 (2023) – Published 17 March 2023 | | | Dalton Anderson, Manav Shah, and Linran Fan Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034059 (2023) – Published 17 March 2023 | | | O.A. Akindele, A. Bernstein, M. Bergevin, S.A. Dazeley, F. Sutanto, A. Mullen, and J. Hecla Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034060 (2023) – Published 20 March 2023 | | | Hiroki Morishita, Naoya Morioka, Testuri Nishikawa, Hajime Yao, Shinobu Onoda, Hiroshi Abe, Takeshi Ohshima, and Norikazu Mizuochi Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034061 (2023) – Published 20 March 2023 | | | Jiachao Xu, Yuanzhen Zheng, Tingfeng Ma, Hui Chen, Bowei Wu, Ji Wang, Shuanghuizhi Li, Iren Kuznetsova, Ilya Nedospasov, Jianke Du, Hao Shi, Dudu Chen, and Fei Sun Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034062 (2023) – Published 20 March 2023 | | | Yu Kumagai Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034063 (2023) – Published 20 March 2023 | | | Editors' Suggestion Alexander P. Read, Benjamin J. Chapman, Chan U Lei, Jacob C. Curtis, Suhas Ganjam, Lev Krayzman, Luigi Frunzio, and Robert J. Schoelkopf Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034064 (2023) – Published 20 March 2023 | To better understand decoherence in superconducting qubits, the authors develop a technique to measure the loss tangent of dielectric substrates and predict the impact of dielectric loss on qubit lifetimes. This is done with no need to fabricate planar devices; the technique is independent of material platform. Measurements of sapphire in a demonstration of the approach suggest that coherence of superconducting qubits on a common form of sapphire is limited significantly by bulk dielectric loss. The same technique also shows that another form of sapphire would substantially mitigate this bulk dielectric loss and prolong qubit coherence. | | | | | | Lei Fan, Yafeng Chen, Shuowei An, Tuo Liu, Haiyan Fan, Jie Zhu, and Zhongqing Su Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034065 (2023) – Published 21 March 2023 | | | Yudong Ding, Wei Xiao, Yixin Zhao, Teng Wu, Xiang Peng, and Hong Guo Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034066 (2023) – Published 21 March 2023 | | | M. Dryazgov, Yu. Korneeva, and A. Korneev Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034067 (2023) – Published 21 March 2023 | | | Yifan Zhang, Hao Wu, Xiaodong Yang, Tianyu Xie, Ye-Xin Wang, Chang Liu, Qing Zhao, Jiyang Ma, Jun Li, and Bo Zhang Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034068 (2023) – Published 21 March 2023 | | | Chunfeng Wu, Chunfang Sun, Jing-Ling Chen, and X.X. Yi Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034069 (2023) – Published 21 March 2023 | | | Mona Rajabali, Roman Ovcharov, Roman Khymyn, Himanshu Fulara, Akash Kumar, Artem Litvinenko, Mohammad Zahedinejad, Afshin Houshang, Ahmad A. Awad, and Johan Åkerman Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034070 (2023) – Published 22 March 2023 | | | F. Setiawan, Peter Groszkowski, and Aashish A. Clerk Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034071 (2023) – Published 22 March 2023 | | | Basile Pottier, Carlos A. Plata, Emmanuel Trizac, David Guéry-Odelin, and Ludovic Bellon Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034072 (2023) – Published 22 March 2023 | | | Hao Ge, Zi-Wei Long, Xiang-Yuan Xu, Jin-Guo Hua, Yang Liu, Bi-Ye Xie, Jian-Hua Jiang, Ming-Hui Lu, and Yan-Feng Chen Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034073 (2023) – Published 22 March 2023 | | | Rui Tian (田锐), Franciszek Hennel, Samuel Bianchi, and Klass P. Pruessmann Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034074 (2023) – Published 23 March 2023 | | | M. Rahimi, K. Sobnath, F. Mallet, P. Lafarge, C. Barraud, W. Daney de Marcillac, D. Fournier, and M.L. Della Rocca Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034075 (2023) – Published 23 March 2023 | | | S.A. Wolf, I. Meirzada, G. Haim, and N. Bar-Gill Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034076 (2023) – Published 23 March 2023 | | | Hong Jie Ng, Shuhan Yang, Zhaoyang Yao, Hyunsoo Yang, and Charles Lim Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034077 (2023) – Published 23 March 2023 | | | Katelyn Dixon, Kent Nickerson, Donald W. Booth, and James P. Shaffer Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034078 (2023) – Published 23 March 2023 | | | Jacopo M. De Ponti, Luca Iorio, Gregory J. Chaplain, Alberto Corigliano, Richard V. Craster, and Raffaele Ardito Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034079 (2023) – Published 24 March 2023 | | | Ao Lou, Yuanyang Yu, Butian Zhang, Yi Liu, Quan Fu, Jiankang Zhang, Hua-Hua Fu, Shun Wang, and Ze-Bing Zhou Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034080 (2023) – Published 24 March 2023 | | | Albert Minj, Karen Geens, Hu Liang, Han Han, Céline Noël, Benoit Bakeroot, Kristof Paredis, Ming Zhao, Thomas Hantschel, and Stefaan Decoutere Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034081 (2023) – Published 24 March 2023 | | | Subith Kumar, Ravi K. Saripalli, Anirban Ghosh, Wagner T. Buono, Andrew Forbes, and G.K. Samanta Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034082 (2023) – Published 24 March 2023 | | | Jingwei Li, Ruixuan Wang, Lutong Cai, and Qing Li Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034083 (2023) – Published 24 March 2023 | | | Qiyuan Wang, Mathias Fink, and Guancong Ma Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034084 (2023) – Published 27 March 2023 | | | Takase Shimizu, Jun-ichiro Ohe, Akira Endo, Taketomo Nakamura, and Shingo Katsumoto Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034085 (2023) – Published 27 March 2023 | | | A. Ciattoni Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034086 (2023) – Published 27 March 2023 | | | Yuan-Hao Yang, Xin-Biao Xu, Jia-Qi Wang, Mai Zhang, Ming Li, Zheng-Xu Zhu, Zhu-Bo Wang, Chun-Hua Dong, Wei Fang, Huakang Yu, Guang-Can Guo, and Chang-Ling Zou Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034087 (2023) – Published 27 March 2023 | | | Teng Xu, Yang Cheng, Yiqing Dong, Hao Bai, Heng-An Zhou, Xinyu Shu, Pierluigi Gargiani, Manuel Valvidares, Pu Yu, and Wanjun Jiang Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034088 (2023) – Published 27 March 2023 | | | Joseph Lindon, Arina Tashchilina, Logan W. Cooke, and Lindsay J. LeBlanc Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034089 (2023) – Published 28 March 2023 | | | Shenyu Zhu, Yong Meng Sua, Ting Bu, and Yu-Ping Huang Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034090 (2023) – Published 28 March 2023 | | | Davi A.D. Chaves, Lukas Nulens, Heleen Dausy, Bart Raes, Donghua Yue, Wilson A. Ortiz, Maycon Motta, Margriet J. Van Bael, and Joris Van de Vondel Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034091 (2023) – Published 28 March 2023 | | | V. Jarý, L. Havlák, J. Bárta, E. Mihóková, R. Kučerková, M. Buryi, V. Babin, P. Průša, T. Vrba, A. Kotlov, and M. Nikl Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034092 (2023) – Published 28 March 2023 | | | Zhi-Xiang Tang and Xun-Wei Xu Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034093 (2023) – Published 28 March 2023 | | | Jonathan Ordoñez-Pimentel, José E. García, Paulo S. da Silva, Jr., and Michel Venet Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034094 (2023) – Published 29 March 2023 | | | Humberto Munoz-Bauza, Lorenzo Campos Venuti, and Daniel Lidar Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034095 (2023) – Published 29 March 2023 | | | Yiyang Luo, Kairong Huang, Xiaoci Liang, Hanjing Ke, Sujuan Hu, Qian Wu, Baiquan Liu, and Chuan Liu Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034096 (2023) – Published 29 March 2023 | | | Yosuke Mori, Sena Kishiya, Takuya Kurosaka, and Hiroshi Gotoda Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034097 (2023) – Published 30 March 2023 | | | V.M. Bevz, M.Yu. Mikhailov, B. Budinská, S. Lamb-Camarena, S.O. Shpilinska, A.V. Chumak, M. Urbánek, M. Arndt, W. Lang, and O.V. Dobrovolskiy Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034098 (2023) – Published 30 March 2023 | | | Editors' Suggestion Jihun Lim and Stephen R. Forrest Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034099 (2023) – Published 31 March 2023 | As the energy economy becomes increasingly decarbonized, low-cost energy storage grows ever more important. Thermal batteries in combination with thermophotovoltaic (TPV) cells are one major source of storage. The lowest-loss TPV cells utilize an air bridge (AB) with a gold back reflector. In this work, the authors determine a 55.5% thermodynamic efficiency limit for AB-TPVs at an emitter temperature of 1400 K, based on detailed balance. Including losses from nonradiative recombination, finite resistance, and free-carrier absorption, the practical efficiency limit is 48.6%. This work provides a road map for evaluating and limiting losses, leading to even higher AB-TPV efficiencies. | | | | | | Review Article Lin Lin, Ryan Jacobs, Tianyu Ma, Dongzheng Chen, John Booske, and Dane Morgan Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 037001 (2023) – Published 22 March 2023 | The familiar work function Φ (the energy barrier for an electron to move across a material's surface into the vacuum) is central to a vast array of surface and interfacial processes, and thus is fundamental to technologies ranging from vacuum and solid-state electronics to catalysis. Despite this importance, multiple issues associated with the varying vacuum level of electrons near surfaces often obscure how Φ is being defined, measured, and used. This Review clarifies the definition of Φ with extra care, summarizes recent approaches for calculating and predicting Φ, and discusses how tuning bulk electronic structure and surface dipoles can be used to engineer Φ. | | | | | | Review Article Rohith Mittapally, Ayan Majumder, Pramod Reddy, and Edgar Meyhofer Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 037002 (2023) – Published 29 March 2023 | Thermophotovoltaic (TPV) energy conversion is a promising power-generation technology for converting heat to electricity. Recent studies have explored TPV devices featuring nanoscale gaps, which take advantage of near-field effects that enable much larger radiative fluxes and power density. The authors review the physics of near-field thermal radiation, and assess theoretical and experimental advances in predicting and validating near-field enhancements of power output and efficiency in TPV devices. Their discussion of the near-field photonic heat engines presented here will help to guide future engineering solutions in developing practical near-field energy-conversion devices. | | | | | | | |
No comments:
Post a Comment