Volume 19, Issue 2 February 2023 | | Advertisement Attending the APS March Meeting 2023 in Las Vegas? Join several editors from the Physical Review Journals Wednesday March 7 at 4:30 p.m. PT for complimentary cocktails and hor d'oeuvres. Discuss your submission, get tips on refereeing, and learn more about editing the Physical Review Journals. All registrants are welcome! Learn more. | | | | | Advertisement The Associate Editor will decide on publication of the most exciting and consequential results in the field, conducting a thorough and high-quality review process. A successful candidate will work together with the editorial teams of two top-notch journals, PRX Quantum and Physical Review Applied, in addition to interacting with their Lead Editors and Editorial Boards. The Associate Editor will also be responsible for engaging and building connections with researchers from this highly regarded multidisciplinary research community. Apply today! | | | | | Not an APS member? Join today to start connecting with a community of more than 50,000 physicists. | | | | Editors' Suggestion Mitul Dey Chowdhury, Aman R. Agrawal, and Dalziel J. Wilson Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024011 (2023) – Published 3 February 2023 | Cavity optomechanical accelerometers promise ultrahigh sensitivity, in situ calibration, and radiation-pressure stabilization for e.g. chip-scale gravimetry or dark-matter searches. However, platforms that meet the unique technical demands are difficult to fabricate. The authors demonstrate a simple, scalable setup with an optical cavity based on a pair of vertically integrated Si3N4 membranes of different stiffnesses. Radiation-pressure cooling of membrane motion enables resolution of chip acceleration to better than 10−7g, over a bandwidth of several kilohertz. A cryogenic array of these devices could be used to search for weak inertial forces due to dark matter. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion Thomas Paul Weiss, Omar Ramírez, Stefan Paetel, Wolfram Witte, Jiro Nishinaga, Thomas Feurer, and Susanne Siebentritt Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024052 (2023) – Published 17 February 2023 | Solar cells are made from semiconductors, which inevitably include defects. The defects in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) are known to be metastable: With excitation they change character, which can have a profound impact on device function. The authors show that these metastable defects reduce the efficiency of the solar cell due to an increased diode factor. It is possible to measure this quantity directly from the bare absorber (without needing to build the entire solar cell), yielding a lower limit for the whole device. Experiments and simulations indicate that metastable defects must be reduced to increase efficiency, and not just in CIGS-based solar cells. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion Jan Aeschlimann, Fabian Ducry, Christoph Weilenmann, Juerg Leuthold, Alexandros Emboras, and Mathieu Luisier Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024058 (2023) – Published 22 February 2023 | Continuum modeling is a popular, computationally efficient technique that can shed light on the resistance-switching properties of conductive bridging random-access memory (CBRAM) cells. Traditional models typically rely on many fitting parameters, but this approach uses material parameters extracted either from either ab initio or machine-learned empirical calculations. As proof of concept, the authors apply the computational framework to an SiO2-based CBRAM cell, and reveal the relevance of Joule heating in nanoscale devices. With the proposed multiscale methodology it is possible to explore the potential of not-yet-fabricated memory cells, and to optimize their design reliably. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion Yasuyuki Narita, Peng Wang, Keita Ikeda, Kazuki Oba, Yoshiyuki Miyamoto, Takashi Taniguchi, Shinobu Onoda, Mutsuko Hatano, and Takayuki Iwasaki Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024061 (2023) – Published 23 February 2023 | Tin-vacancy (Sn-V) centers in diamond, which possess good optical and spin properties, are a promising system for constructing quantum network nodes. Tin atoms are heavy, though, and generating photons with identical wavelength and linewidth from multiple Sn-V emitters is challenging, due to the strain in the diamond host material. This study shows that multiple Sn-V centers, formed deep within bulk diamond by ion implantation and high-temperature annealing, emit nearly identical photons. This leads to two-photon interference from distant centers, an important step toward building quantum network nodes. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion Ludwik Kranz, Stephen Roche, Samuel K. Gorman, Joris. G. Keizer, and Michelle Y. Simmons Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024068 (2023) – Published 24 February 2023 | Epitaxial atom-based spin qubits in silicon exhibit excellent properties, and benefit from the outstanding scalability of that material platform. As silicon spin-based qubits now start to meet the 99% fault-tolerance threshold, the authors show how the nuclear spins inherent to the local magnetic environment can be engineered as atomic magnets to boost the fidelities of two-qubit logic gates. Modeling indicates that two-qubit CNOT gate fidelities as high as 99.98% are realistic, through silicon purification and careful engineering. This work provides a roadmap for atom qubits in silicon, showing how to optimize two-qubit gates at both the design and measurement stages. | | | | | | Letter Guillermo Camacho, Alejandro Rodriguez-Barroso, Oscar Martinez-Cano, Jose R. Morillas, Pietro Tierno, and Juan de Vicente Phys. Rev. Applied 19, L021001 (2023) – Published 21 February 2023 | The transport of matter via a ratchet effect represents a convenient way to extract useful work from a thermodynamic system, and can have direct applications in several microscale fluid-based technologies. Most realizations so far have been centered on using Newtonian fluids. This study shows how to achieve directed transport of magnetic microparticles in a non-Newtonian shear-thinning fluid under a square-wave magnetic force. This technique could be used in active microrheology, to infer the nonlinear properties of viscoelastic media. | | | | | | Yunwei Sheng, Mathieu Mirjolet, Mario Villa, Jaume Gàzquez, José Santiso, Andreas Klein, Jordi Fraxedas, and Josep Fontcuberta Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024001 (2023) – Published 1 February 2023 | | | J.A. Potter, J.C. Fenton, and P.A. Warburton Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024002 (2023) – Published 1 February 2023 | | | Yanmei Zang, Qian Wu, Shuhua Wang, Baibiao Huang, Ying Dai, and Yandong Ma Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024003 (2023) – Published 1 February 2023 | | | Vishnu V. Krishnan, Kabir Ramola, and Smarajit Karmakar Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024004 (2023) – Published 1 February 2023 | | | Menno Demmenie, Lars Reus, Paul Kolpakov, Sander Woutersen, Daniel Bonn, and Noushine Shahidzadeh Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024005 (2023) – Published 2 February 2023 | | | Noah Gorgichuk, Tobias Junginger, and Rogério de Sousa Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024006 (2023) – Published 2 February 2023 | | | Mohammad Alipourzadeh, Sakineh Vosoughi-nia, Yaser Hajati, and Imam Makhfudz Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024007 (2023) – Published 2 February 2023 | | | Qingqing Zhang, Lishuai Yu, Zhengpin Bian, Dong Yuan, Hailing Sun, Biao Tang, Xubing Lu, Feilong Liu, and Guofu Zhou Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024008 (2023) – Published 2 February 2023 | | | Zeren Zhang, Fubao Yang, and Jiping Huang Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024009 (2023) – Published 3 February 2023 | | | Xiaoxiang Zhu, Yuechao Wang, and Wenyu Ji Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024010 (2023) – Published 3 February 2023 | | | Editors' Suggestion Mitul Dey Chowdhury, Aman R. Agrawal, and Dalziel J. Wilson Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024011 (2023) – Published 3 February 2023 | Cavity optomechanical accelerometers promise ultrahigh sensitivity, in situ calibration, and radiation-pressure stabilization for e.g. chip-scale gravimetry or dark-matter searches. However, platforms that meet the unique technical demands are difficult to fabricate. The authors demonstrate a simple, scalable setup with an optical cavity based on a pair of vertically integrated Si3N4 membranes of different stiffnesses. Radiation-pressure cooling of membrane motion enables resolution of chip acceleration to better than 10−7g, over a bandwidth of several kilohertz. A cryogenic array of these devices could be used to search for weak inertial forces due to dark matter. | | | | | | Peter Yun (云恩学), Rodolphe Boudot, and Emeric de Clercq Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024012 (2023) – Published 3 February 2023 | | | Hao Deng, Zhijun Song, Ran Gao, Tian Xia, Feng Bao, Xun Jiang, Hsiang-Sheng Ku, Zhisheng Li, Xizheng Ma, Jin Qin, Hantao Sun, Chengchun Tang, Tenghui Wang, Feng Wu, Wenlong Yu, Gengyan Zhang, Xiaohang Zhang, Jingwei Zhou, Xing Zhu, Yaoyun Shi, Hui-Hai Zhao, and Chunqing Deng Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024013 (2023) – Published 6 February 2023 | | | Arno Bargerbos, Lukas Johannes Splitthoff, Marta Pita-Vidal, Jaap J. Wesdorp, Yu Liu, Peter Krogstrup, Leo P. Kouwenhoven, Christian Kraglund Andersen, and Lukas Grünhaupt Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024014 (2023) – Published 6 February 2023 | | | Jozef Bucko, Frank Schäfer, František Herman, Rebekka Garreis, Chuyao Tong, Annika Kurzmann, Thomas Ihn, and Eliska Greplova Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024015 (2023) – Published 6 February 2023 | | | Arshid Nisar, Tanmoy Pramanik, and Brajesh Kumar Kaushik Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024016 (2023) – Published 6 February 2023 | | | Gabriel Amselem, Christophe Clanet, and Michael Benzaquen Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024017 (2023) – Published 7 February 2023 | | | Xin Li, Jian Feng Chen, Wei Yuan, Zhan Hao Wu, Wen Xuan Tang, Lei Wang, Qiang Cheng, and Tie Jun Cui Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024018 (2023) – Published 7 February 2023 | | | Naeem Iqbal, Sen Zhang, Shuai Wang, Zezheng Fang, Yaoyuan Hu, Yongdi Dang, Minjie Zhang, Yi Jin, Jianbin Xu, Binfeng Ju, and Yungui Ma Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024019 (2023) – Published 7 February 2023 | | | Tatsuya Yamamoto, Tomohiro Ichinose, Jun Uzuhashi, Takayuki Nozaki, Tadakatsu Ohkubo, Kay Yakushiji, Shingo Tamaru, and Shinji Yuasa Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024020 (2023) – Published 7 February 2023 | | | Zhiguo Wang, Xiang Peng, Zhiqiang Xiong, Jintao Zheng, Hui Luo, and Hong Guo Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024021 (2023) – Published 8 February 2023 | | | Jin Xiang, Qingyi Zhou, Soongyu Yi, and Yurui Qu Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024022 (2023) – Published 8 February 2023 | | | Shi-Qiao Wu, Zhi-Kang Lin, Zhan Xiong, Bin Jiang, and Jian-Hua Jiang Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024023 (2023) – Published 8 February 2023 | | | Shibo Fang, Chen Yang, Qiuhui Li, Baochun Wu, Linqiang Xu, Shiqi Liu, Jie Yang, Jiachen Ma, Jichao Dong, Ying Li, Jinbo Yang, and Jing Lu Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024024 (2023) – Published 8 February 2023 | | | Chao Li, Boqi Qiu, Yuri Yoshioka, Kazuhiko Hirakawa, and Ya Zhang Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024025 (2023) – Published 9 February 2023 | | | Lijuan Fan and Jun Mei Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024026 (2023) – Published 9 February 2023 | | | Zeqiao Zhou, Yuxuan Du, Xinmei Tian, and Dacheng Tao Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024027 (2023) – Published 9 February 2023 | | | Zhengjie Huang, Liang Peng, Zhongbo Zhu, Xiaojun Hu, Chun Wang, Jingxin Tang, and Dexin Ye Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024028 (2023) – Published 9 February 2023 | | | Mangyuan Ma, Wen Siang Lew, and Fusheng Ma Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024029 (2023) – Published 10 February 2023 | | | Hongyue Xu, Haoran Chen, Fanlong Zeng, Jia Xu, Xi Shen, and Yizheng Wu Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024030 (2023) – Published 10 February 2023 | | | Filipa R. Prudêncio and Mário G. Silveirinha Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024031 (2023) – Published 10 February 2023 | | | Guillaume Noetinger, Samuel Métais, Geoffroy Lerosey, Mathias Fink, Sébastien M. Popoff, and Fabrice Lemoult Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024032 (2023) – Published 10 February 2023 | | | R.K. Han, L. Liu, H.L. Sun, H.R. Qin, X.P. Zhao, D. Pan, D.H. Wei, and J.H. Zhao Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024033 (2023) – Published 13 February 2023 | | | Kaifeng Dong, Zhe Guo, YiYi Jiao, Ruofan Li, Chao Sun, Ying Tao, Shuai Zhang, Jeongmin Hong, and Long You Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024034 (2023) – Published 13 February 2023 | | | L. Rehm, C.C.M. Capriata, S. Misra, J.D. Smith, M. Pinarbasi, B.G. Malm, and A.D. Kent Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024035 (2023) – Published 13 February 2023 | | | Sang Vin Jang, Sung Won Lee, and Joo Hwan Oh Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024036 (2023) – Published 13 February 2023 | | | Baochun Wu, Shibo Fang, Jie Yang, Shiqi Liu, Yuxuan Peng, Qiuhui Li, Zhongchong Lin, Junjie Shi, Wenyun Yang, Zhaochu Luo, Changsheng Wang, Jinbo Yang, Jing Lu, and Honglin Du Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024037 (2023) – Published 14 February 2023 | | | M. Hanke, N. Ashurbekov, E. Zatterin, M.E. Msall, J. Hellemann, P.V. Santos, T.U. Schulli, and S. Ludwig Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024038 (2023) – Published 14 February 2023 | | | V. M. Muravev, A. V. Shchepetilnikov, K. R. Dzhikirba, I. V. Kukushkin, R. Schott, E. Cheah, W. Wegscheider, and A. Shuvaev Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024039 (2023) – Published 14 February 2023 | | | Shu Zou, Zhengwentao Cheng, Xian Zhang, Guanfang Wang, Hongfan Liu, Zebang Yang, Yuan Zhong, Jianping Liu, Liangcheng Tu, Shanqing Yang, and Zhu Li Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024040 (2023) – Published 14 February 2023 | | | Lishuai Yu, Qingqing Zhang, Zhengpin Bian, Guangzheng Zuo, Harm van Eersel, Peter A. Bobbert, Reinder Coehoorn, Feilong Liu, and Guofu Zhou Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024041 (2023) – Published 15 February 2023 | | | Pavel Gallina, Andrea Konečná, Jiří Liška, Juan Carlos Idrobo, and Tomáš Šikola Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024042 (2023) – Published 15 February 2023 | | | David Rodríguez Pérez, Paul Varosy, Ziqian Li, Tanay Roy, Eliot Kapit, and David Schuster Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024043 (2023) – Published 15 February 2023 | | | Yuanyang Du, Jiebin Peng, Zhong Shi, and Jie Ren Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024044 (2023) – Published 15 February 2023 | | | Bo-Long Wang, Xin-Lei Hei, Xing-Liang Dong, Xiao-Yu Yao, Jia-Qiang Chen, Yi-Fan Qiao, Fu-Li Li, and Peng-Bo Li Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024045 (2023) – Published 16 February 2023 | | | Jilei Chen, Kei Yamamoto, Jianyu Zhang, Ji Ma, Hanchen Wang, Yuanwei Sun, Mingfeng Chen, Jing Ma, Song Liu, Peng Gao, Dapeng Yu, Jean-Philippe Ansermet, Ce-Wen Nan, Sadamichi Maekawa, and Haiming Yu Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024046 (2023) – Published 16 February 2023 | | | Manpreet Singh Jattana, Fengping Jin, Hans De Raedt, and Kristel Michielsen Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024047 (2023) – Published 16 February 2023 | | | Peng Cheng, Deyuan Yao, Jinwei Yan, Tingting Ye, Huanhuan Liu, Hong Zeng, Xiaomei Pan, Genqiang Zhang, and Junfeng Ding Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024048 (2023) – Published 16 February 2023 | | | Wei Lyu, Weiwei Tang, Wei Yan, and Min Qiu Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024049 (2023) – Published 17 February 2023 | | | Jianjun Lin, Yuang Chen, Hongru Wang, Bobo Tian, Ye Chen, Zhiyong Zhou, Fangyu Yue, Rong Huang, Chun-Gang Duan, Junhao Chu, and Lin Sun Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024050 (2023) – Published 17 February 2023 | | | Yan Liang, Pu Shen, Li-Na Ji, and Zheng-Yuan Xue Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024051 (2023) – Published 17 February 2023 | | | Editors' Suggestion Thomas Paul Weiss, Omar Ramírez, Stefan Paetel, Wolfram Witte, Jiro Nishinaga, Thomas Feurer, and Susanne Siebentritt Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024052 (2023) – Published 17 February 2023 | Solar cells are made from semiconductors, which inevitably include defects. The defects in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) are known to be metastable: With excitation they change character, which can have a profound impact on device function. The authors show that these metastable defects reduce the efficiency of the solar cell due to an increased diode factor. It is possible to measure this quantity directly from the bare absorber (without needing to build the entire solar cell), yielding a lower limit for the whole device. Experiments and simulations indicate that metastable defects must be reduced to increase efficiency, and not just in CIGS-based solar cells. | | | | | | Yun Zhou, Naiqing Zhang, Dia'aaldin J. Bisharat, Robert J. Davis, Zichen Zhang, James Friend, Prabhakar R. Bandaru, and Daniel F. Sievenpiper Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024053 (2023) – Published 21 February 2023 | | | Takuto Ichikawa, Aizitiaili Abulikemu, and Muneaki Hase Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024054 (2023) – Published 21 February 2023 | | | Kohei Etou, Satoshi Hiura, Soyoung Park, Junichi Takayama, Agus Subagyo, Kazuhisa Sueoka, and Akihiro Murayama Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024055 (2023) – Published 21 February 2023 | | | Xiao-Fei Liu, Nikolai Spitzer, Haruki Kiyama, Arne Ludwig, Andreas D. Wieck, and Akira Oiwa Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024056 (2023) – Published 22 February 2023 | | | Xuexin Xu and M. Ansari Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024057 (2023) – Published 22 February 2023 | | | Editors' Suggestion Jan Aeschlimann, Fabian Ducry, Christoph Weilenmann, Juerg Leuthold, Alexandros Emboras, and Mathieu Luisier Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024058 (2023) – Published 22 February 2023 | Continuum modeling is a popular, computationally efficient technique that can shed light on the resistance-switching properties of conductive bridging random-access memory (CBRAM) cells. Traditional models typically rely on many fitting parameters, but this approach uses material parameters extracted either from either ab initio or machine-learned empirical calculations. As proof of concept, the authors apply the computational framework to an SiO2-based CBRAM cell, and reveal the relevance of Joule heating in nanoscale devices. With the proposed multiscale methodology it is possible to explore the potential of not-yet-fabricated memory cells, and to optimize their design reliably. | | | | | | Andrzej Kolek Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024059 (2023) – Published 22 February 2023 | | | Khang Hoang Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024060 (2023) – Published 23 February 2023 | | | Editors' Suggestion Yasuyuki Narita, Peng Wang, Keita Ikeda, Kazuki Oba, Yoshiyuki Miyamoto, Takashi Taniguchi, Shinobu Onoda, Mutsuko Hatano, and Takayuki Iwasaki Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024061 (2023) – Published 23 February 2023 | Tin-vacancy (Sn-V) centers in diamond, which possess good optical and spin properties, are a promising system for constructing quantum network nodes. Tin atoms are heavy, though, and generating photons with identical wavelength and linewidth from multiple Sn-V emitters is challenging, due to the strain in the diamond host material. This study shows that multiple Sn-V centers, formed deep within bulk diamond by ion implantation and high-temperature annealing, emit nearly identical photons. This leads to two-photon interference from distant centers, an important step toward building quantum network nodes. | | | | | | P.I. Gerevenkov, Ia.A. Filatov, A.M. Kalashnikova, and N.E. Khokhlov Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024062 (2023) – Published 23 February 2023 | | | Debasis Das, Yunuo Cen, Jianze Wang, and Xuanyao Fong Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024063 (2023) – Published 23 February 2023 | | | R. Kumar, C.E. Fillion, B. Lovery, I. Benguettat-El Mokhtari, I. Joumard, S. Auffret, L. Ranno, Y. Roussigné, S.M. Chérif, A. Stashkevich, M. Belmeguenai, C. Baraduc, and H. Béa Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024064 (2023) – Published 24 February 2023 | | | D.P. Pattnaik, Y. Ushakov, Z. Zhou, P. Borisov, M.D. Cropper, U.W. Wijayantha, A.G. Balanov, and S.E. Savel′ev Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024065 (2023) – Published 24 February 2023 | | | T. Chang, T. Cohen, I. Holzman, G. Catelani, and M. Stern Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024066 (2023) – Published 24 February 2023 | | | Giovanni Franco-Rivera, Josiah Cochran, Seiji Miyashita, Sylvain Bertaina, and Irinel Chiorescu Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024067 (2023) – Published 24 February 2023 | | | Editors' Suggestion Ludwik Kranz, Stephen Roche, Samuel K. Gorman, Joris. G. Keizer, and Michelle Y. Simmons Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024068 (2023) – Published 24 February 2023 | Epitaxial atom-based spin qubits in silicon exhibit excellent properties, and benefit from the outstanding scalability of that material platform. As silicon spin-based qubits now start to meet the 99% fault-tolerance threshold, the authors show how the nuclear spins inherent to the local magnetic environment can be engineered as atomic magnets to boost the fidelities of two-qubit logic gates. Modeling indicates that two-qubit CNOT gate fidelities as high as 99.98% are realistic, through silicon purification and careful engineering. This work provides a roadmap for atom qubits in silicon, showing how to optimize two-qubit gates at both the design and measurement stages. | | | | | | Guanyang He, Yiou Zhang, and Gang Xiao Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024069 (2023) – Published 27 February 2023 | | | Ko Ito, Takeshi Kondo, Kyoko Mannami, Kazuya Niizeki, Daisuke Yoshida, Kohei Minaguchi, Mingyang Zheng, Xiuping Xie, Feng-Lei Hong, and Tomoyuki Horikiri Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024070 (2023) – Published 27 February 2023 | | | Rahman Sharaf, Sara Darbari, and Abdelkrim Khelif Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024071 (2023) – Published 27 February 2023 | | | Jiajun Feng, Hui Tan, Jun-Feng Liu, and Jun Wang Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024072 (2023) – Published 27 February 2023 | | | B. Niedzielski, C.L. Jia, and J. Berakdar Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024073 (2023) – Published 28 February 2023 | | | Adrian Holzäpfel, Antonio Ortu, and Mikael Afzelius Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024074 (2023) – Published 28 February 2023 | | | Ruigang Li, Jun-Feng Liu, and Jun Wang Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024075 (2023) – Published 28 February 2023 | | | Peng Li, Sanyum Channa, Xiang Li, Laith Alahmed, Chunli Tang, Di Yi, Lauren Riddiford, Jacob Wisser, Purnima P. Balakrishnan, Xin Yu Zheng, Di Lu, Arturas Vailionis, Shan X. Wang, and Yuri Suzuki Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024076 (2023) – Published 28 February 2023 | | | | |
No comments:
Post a Comment