Volume 108, Issue 3 September 2023 | | Advertisement | Do you need language assistance for your next submission? Take advantage of new translation, figure assistance, and text editing services provided by APS and Editage. Experience exceptional support, expertise, and dedication for all your publishing needs. Get a quote. | | | | | | Not an APS member? Join today to start connecting with a community of more than 50,000 physicists. | | | | EDITORIALS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS | Randall D. Kamien Phys. Rev. C 108, 030001 (2023) – Published 25 September 2023 | | | Editors' Suggestion N. Hizawa, K. Hagino, and K. Yoshida Phys. Rev. C 108, 034311 (2023) – Published 21 September 2023 | Adapting a technique recently developed in atomic electron systems to nuclear physics, the authors employ a deep-learning method to analyze a Skyrme energy density functional (Skyrme-EDF) with the goal to construct an orbital-free functional that depends only on the particle density distribution. In a first step they compute the energy and particle densities of a nucleus using the Skyrme Kohn-Sham + Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer method. With those sets of data and a deep-learning approach they then train an orbital-free functional. When applied to the 24Mg nucleus, the newly constructed functional successfully reproduces the binding energy of the original Skyrme-EDF, with an accuracy of about 40 keV. The significant computational advantage compared to traditional EDF approaches promises useful alternatives for future applications such as for calculating more complex nuclear shapes in heavy and superheavy nuclei. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion C. V. Nithish Kumar and L. M. Robledo Phys. Rev. C 108, 034312 (2023) – Published 22 September 2023 | Understanding the interplay between the intrinsic shape of nuclei and the dynamics of their low-lying collective states is one of the most pressing challenges in contemporary nuclear structure physics. Within the framework of the generator coordinate method with a Gogny interaction, this paper highlights the important role of hexadecapole deformation in several isotopes of the rare earth region. These features could also have an impact on the evaluation of neutrinoless double-β decay nuclear matrix elements and on heavy ion collision dynamics. The study highlights that the physics touched by considering the hexadecapole degree of freedom is not trivial, and its study is worth further consideration. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion S. R. Elliott, V. N. Gavrin, W. C. Haxton, T. V. Ibragimova, and E. J. Rule Phys. Rev. C 108, 035502 (2023) – Published 25 September 2023 | The 71Ga radiochemical experiments provided the first constraint on the flux of low-energy electron neutrinos coming from the Sun. Crucial neutrino calibration experiments, however, using intense β-decay sources, yielded rates below that predicted by theory. A recent effort to check the "gallium anomaly" using a more intense source exacerbated the discrepancy. This paper carefully reexamines the nuclear physics of neutrino absorption on 71Ga, slightly reducing but not eliminating the puzzling anomaly. | | | | | | Letter H. Lu, O. Holderer, A. Ioffe, S. Pasini, P. Pistel, Z. Salhi, B. M. Goodson, W. M. Snow, and E. Babcock Phys. Rev. C 108, L031001 (2023) – Published 11 September 2023 | | | Letter Gerald A. Miller Phys. Rev. C 108, L031002 (2023) – Published 28 September 2023 | | | Letter Z. C. Xu, S. Zhang, J. G. Li, S. L. Jin, Q. Yuan, Z. H. Cheng, N. Michel, and F. R. Xu Phys. Rev. C 108, L031301 (2023) – Published 6 September 2023 | | | Letter J. Rzadkiewicz, K. Słabkowska, M. Polasik, Ł. Syrocki, J. J. Carroll, and C. J. Chiara Phys. Rev. C 108, L031302 (2023) – Published 13 September 2023 | | | Letter Sibo Wang, Hui Tong, Qiang Zhao, Chencan Wang, Peter Ring, and Jie Meng Phys. Rev. C 108, L031303 (2023) – Published 18 September 2023 | | | Letter J. D. Martin, S. J. Novario, D. Lonardoni, J. Carlson, S. Gandolfi, and I. Tews Phys. Rev. C 108, L031304 (2023) – Published 21 September 2023 | | | Letter N. Gavrielov, J. E. García-Ramos, P. Van Isacker, and A. Leviatan Phys. Rev. C 108, L031305 (2023) – Published 28 September 2023 | | | Letter I. Stetcu, A. Baroni, and J. Carlson Phys. Rev. C 108, L031306 (2023) – Published 29 September 2023 | | | Letter Rui Wang, Yu-Gang Ma, Lie-Wen Chen, Che Ming Ko, Kai-Jia Sun, and Zhen Zhang Phys. Rev. C 108, L031601 (2023) – Published 22 September 2023 | | | Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction, Few-Body Systems | Abraham R. Flores and Kenneth M. Nollett Phys. Rev. C 108, 034001 (2023) – Published 7 September 2023 | | | P. Yin, X. L. Shang, J. N. Hu, J. Y. Fu, E. Epelbaum, and W. Zuo Phys. Rev. C 108, 034002 (2023) – Published 8 September 2023 | | | D. Davesne, J. W. Holt, J. Navarro, and A. Pastore Phys. Rev. C 108, 034003 (2023) – Published 28 September 2023 | | | W. J. Huang, X. Zhou, Y. H. Zhang, M. Wang, Yu. A. Litvinov, and K. Blaum Phys. Rev. C 108, 034301 (2023) – Published 1 September 2023 | | | A. V. Voinov, N. Alanazi, S. Akhtar, S. Dhakal, C. R. Brune, S. M. Grimes, T. N. Massey, Z. Meisel, C. E. Parker, and A. L. Richard Phys. Rev. C 108, 034302 (2023) – Published 1 September 2023 | | | A. N. Andreyev et al. Phys. Rev. C 108, 034303 (2023) – Published 1 September 2023 | | | T. H. Ogunbeku, B. P. Crider, S. N. Liddick, B. A. Brown, A. Chester, K. L. Childers, P. Chowdhury, E. Lamere, R. Lewis, B. Longfellow, R. S. Lubna, S. Lyons, S. K. Neupane, D. Perez-Loureiro, C. J. Prokop, A. L. Richard, U. Silwal, D. P. Siwakoti, D. C. Smith, M. K. Smith, and Y. Xiao Phys. Rev. C 108, 034304 (2023) – Published 5 September 2023 | | | Kenichi Yoshida, Yifei Niu, and Futoshi Minato Phys. Rev. C 108, 034305 (2023) – Published 5 September 2023 | | | X. B. Wang, Yongjing Chen, G. X. Dong, Yang Su, Zeyu Li, X. Z. Wu, and Z. X. Li Phys. Rev. C 108, 034306 (2023) – Published 6 September 2023 | | | G. Royer, T. Boureau, and N. Potiron Phys. Rev. C 108, 034307 (2023) – Published 12 September 2023 | | | C. Ma, X. Yin, and Y. M. Zhao Phys. Rev. C 108, 034308 (2023) – Published 12 September 2023 | | | Jiaqi Wang, Saumi Dutta, Long-Jun Wang, and Yang Sun Phys. Rev. C 108, 034309 (2023) – Published 15 September 2023 | | | A. Pfeil, K. Nomura, N. Gavrielov, J.-M. Régis, U. Köster, Y. H. Kim, A. Esmaylzadeh, A. Harter, J. Jolie, L. Knafla, M. Ley, and V. Karayonchev Phys. Rev. C 108, 034310 (2023) – Published 19 September 2023 | | | Editors' Suggestion N. Hizawa, K. Hagino, and K. Yoshida Phys. Rev. C 108, 034311 (2023) – Published 21 September 2023 | Adapting a technique recently developed in atomic electron systems to nuclear physics, the authors employ a deep-learning method to analyze a Skyrme energy density functional (Skyrme-EDF) with the goal to construct an orbital-free functional that depends only on the particle density distribution. In a first step they compute the energy and particle densities of a nucleus using the Skyrme Kohn-Sham + Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer method. With those sets of data and a deep-learning approach they then train an orbital-free functional. When applied to the 24Mg nucleus, the newly constructed functional successfully reproduces the binding energy of the original Skyrme-EDF, with an accuracy of about 40 keV. The significant computational advantage compared to traditional EDF approaches promises useful alternatives for future applications such as for calculating more complex nuclear shapes in heavy and superheavy nuclei. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion C. V. Nithish Kumar and L. M. Robledo Phys. Rev. C 108, 034312 (2023) – Published 22 September 2023 | Understanding the interplay between the intrinsic shape of nuclei and the dynamics of their low-lying collective states is one of the most pressing challenges in contemporary nuclear structure physics. Within the framework of the generator coordinate method with a Gogny interaction, this paper highlights the important role of hexadecapole deformation in several isotopes of the rare earth region. These features could also have an impact on the evaluation of neutrinoless double-β decay nuclear matrix elements and on heavy ion collision dynamics. The study highlights that the physics touched by considering the hexadecapole degree of freedom is not trivial, and its study is worth further consideration. | | | | | | Yoshihiko Kobayashi and Masayuki Matsuo Phys. Rev. C 108, 034313 (2023) – Published 27 September 2023 | | | D. H. Jakubassa-Amundsen and X. Roca-Maza Phys. Rev. C 108, 034314 (2023) – Published 27 September 2023 | | | Zu-Xing Yang (杨祖星), Xiao-Hua Fan (范小华), Tomoya Naito (内藤 智也), Zhong-Ming Niu (牛中明), Zhi-Pan Li (李志攀), and Haozhao Liang (梁豪兆) Phys. Rev. C 108, 034315 (2023) – Published 29 September 2023 | | | E. Maya-Barbecho, S. Baid, J. M. Arias, and J. E. García-Ramos Phys. Rev. C 108, 034316 (2023) – Published 29 September 2023 | | | J. Kovoor et al. Phys. Rev. C 108, 034601 (2023) – Published 1 September 2023 | | | Bo Mei, Yutian Guan, Ningxin Zeng, Ziying Mai, Jiajun Tu, Tianjun Yu, Shitao Wang, Xueheng Zhang, Peng Ma, Xiaodong Xu, Xiaolin Tu, Yazhou Sun, Zhiyu Sun, Shuwen Tang, Yuhong Yu, Fang Fang, Duo Yan, Shuya Jin, Yixuan Zhao, Shaobo Ma, and Yongjie Zhang Phys. Rev. C 108, 034602 (2023) – Published 1 September 2023 | | | Hibiki Nakada, Kazuki Yoshida, and Kazuyuki Ogata Phys. Rev. C 108, 034603 (2023) – Published 1 September 2023 | | | M. Bowry, O. B. Tarasov, J. S. Berryman, V. Bader, D. Bazin, T. Chupp, H. L. Crawford, A. Gade, E. Lunderberg, A. Ratkiewicz, F. Recchia, B. M. Sherrill, D. Smalley, A. Stolz, S. R. Stroberg, D. Weisshaar, S. Williams, K. Wimmer, and J. Yurkon Phys. Rev. C 108, 034604 (2023) – Published 1 September 2023 | | | S. Imajo, H. Akatsuka, K. Hatanaka, T. Higuchi, G. Ichikawa, S. Kawasaki, M. Kitaguchi, R. Mammei, R. Matsumiya, K. Mishima, R. Picker, W. Schreyer, and H. M. Shimizu Phys. Rev. C 108, 034605 (2023) – Published 5 September 2023 | | | R. Zargini and S. A. Seyyedi Phys. Rev. C 108, 034606 (2023) – Published 5 September 2023 | | | Xiao-Hua Fan, Zu-Xing Yang, Peng-Hui Chen, Shunji Nishimura, and Zhi-Pan Li Phys. Rev. C 108, 034607 (2023) – Published 6 September 2023 | | | K. Haak et al. Phys. Rev. C 108, 034608 (2023) – Published 7 September 2023 | | | N. Saneesh, Divya Arora, A. Chatterjee, Neeraj Kumar, Anamika Parihari, Chandra Kumar, I. Ahmed, S. Kumar, Mohit Kumar, Akhil Jhingan, K. S. Golda, A. M. Vinodkumar, and P. Sugathan Phys. Rev. C 108, 034609 (2023) – Published 8 September 2023 | | | Tatsuya Katabuchi, Masayuki Igashira, So Kamada, Michihide Tajika, Nobuyuki Iwamoto, and Toshihiko Kawano Phys. Rev. C 108, 034610 (2023) – Published 11 September 2023 | | | Rupinder Kaur, BirBikram Singh, Maninder Kaur, Manoj K. Sharma, and Pushpendra P. Singh Phys. Rev. C 108, 034611 (2023) – Published 11 September 2023 | | | Jin Lei and Antonio M. Moro Phys. Rev. C 108, 034612 (2023) – Published 13 September 2023 | | | Xiang Chen, Li Li, Ying Cui, Junping Yang, Zhuxia Li, and Yingxun Zhang Phys. Rev. C 108, 034613 (2023) – Published 13 September 2023 | | | Xiao-Yun Wang, Chen Dong, and Quanjin Wang Phys. Rev. C 108, 034614 (2023) – Published 14 September 2023 | | | K. Atreya, A. Sen, T. K. Ghosh, A. K. Nasirov, D. Paul, Md. Moin Shaikh, K. Banerjee, C. Bhattacharya, Samir Kundu, S. Manna, G. Mukherjee, S. Nandi, R. Pandey, T. K. Rana, Pratap Roy, S. Mukhopadhyay, and Raj Kumar Santra Phys. Rev. C 108, 034615 (2023) – Published 21 September 2023 | | | Guillaume Scamps and George Bertsch Phys. Rev. C 108, 034616 (2023) – Published 21 September 2023 | | | Wen-Mei Guo, Bao-An Li, and Gao-Chan Yong Phys. Rev. C 108, 034617 (2023) – Published 25 September 2023 | | | Relativistic Nuclear Collisions | Shian Tang, Shanjin Wu, and Huichao Song Phys. Rev. C 108, 034901 (2023) – Published 1 September 2023 | | | Hadi Mehrabpour and S. M. A. Tabatabaee Phys. Rev. C 108, 034902 (2023) – Published 1 September 2023 | | | Chaoyu Pan, Shuhan Zheng, Meimei Yang, Zhiwei Liu, and Baoyi Chen Phys. Rev. C 108, 034903 (2023) – Published 5 September 2023 | | | K. Werner and B. Guiot Phys. Rev. C 108, 034904 (2023) – Published 11 September 2023 | | | H. Hirvonen, K. J. Eskola, and H. Niemi Phys. Rev. C 108, 034905 (2023) – Published 13 September 2023 | | | S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration ) Phys. Rev. C 108, 034906 (2023) – Published 15 September 2023 | | | Chandrodoy Chattopadhyay, Ulrich Heinz, and Thomas Schäfer Phys. Rev. C 108, 034907 (2023) – Published 18 September 2023 | | | Dmytro Oliinychenko, Agnieszka Sorensen, Volker Koch, and Larry McLerran Phys. Rev. C 108, 034908 (2023) – Published 18 September 2023 | | | S. Ji, M. Virta, T. Kallio, S. H. Lim, and D. J. Kim Phys. Rev. C 108, 034909 (2023) – Published 18 September 2023 | | | Xin An, Gökçe Başar, Mikhail Stephanov, and Ho-Ung Yee Phys. Rev. C 108, 034910 (2023) – Published 19 September 2023 | | | Jordan Wu, Weiyao Ke, and Xin-Nian Wang Phys. Rev. C 108, 034911 (2023) – Published 26 September 2023 | | | Khaled Abdel-Waged and Nuha Felemban Phys. Rev. C 108, 034912 (2023) – Published 29 September 2023 | | | A. Karki et al. (Hall C Collaboration) Phys. Rev. C 108, 035201 (2023) – Published 5 September 2023 | | | J. Dove et al. (FNAL E906/SeaQuest Collaboration) Phys. Rev. C 108, 035202 (2023) – Published 6 September 2023 | | | Fatemeh Arbabifar, Shahin Atashbar Tehrani, and Hamzeh Khanpour Phys. Rev. C 108, 035203 (2023) – Published 7 September 2023 | | | Ibuki Terashima and Tetsuo Hyodo Phys. Rev. C 108, 035204 (2023) – Published 21 September 2023 | | | V. Montesinos, M. Albaladejo, J. Nieves, and L. Tolos Phys. Rev. C 108, 035205 (2023) – Published 21 September 2023 | | | Electroweak Interaction, Symmetries | Qian-Qian Guo and Hai-Qing Zhou Phys. Rev. C 108, 035501 (2023) – Published 22 September 2023 | | | Editors' Suggestion S. R. Elliott, V. N. Gavrin, W. C. Haxton, T. V. Ibragimova, and E. J. Rule Phys. Rev. C 108, 035502 (2023) – Published 25 September 2023 | The 71Ga radiochemical experiments provided the first constraint on the flux of low-energy electron neutrinos coming from the Sun. Crucial neutrino calibration experiments, however, using intense β-decay sources, yielded rates below that predicted by theory. A recent effort to check the "gallium anomaly" using a more intense source exacerbated the discrepancy. This paper carefully reexamines the nuclear physics of neutrino absorption on 71Ga, slightly reducing but not eliminating the puzzling anomaly. | | | | | | Trisha Sarkar, Vivek Baruah Thapa, and Monika Sinha Phys. Rev. C 108, 035801 (2023) – Published 5 September 2023 | | | Xiankai Li et al. (CSNS Back-n Collaboration) Phys. Rev. C 108, 035802 (2023) – Published 6 September 2023 | | | Lami Suleiman, Micaela Oertel, and Marco Mancini Phys. Rev. C 108, 035803 (2023) – Published 11 September 2023 | | | D. W. Bardayan Phys. Rev. C 108, 035804 (2023) – Published 12 September 2023 | | | K-U. Kettner, H. W. Becker, C. R. Brune, R. J. deBoer, J. Görres, D. Odell, D. Rogalla, and M. Wiescher Phys. Rev. C 108, 035805 (2023) – Published 13 September 2023 | | | T. Depastas, S. T. Sun, H. Zheng, and A. Bonasera Phys. Rev. C 108, 035806 (2023) – Published 13 September 2023 | | | L. Canete et al. Phys. Rev. C 108, 035807 (2023) – Published 14 September 2023 | | | P. Klausner, F. Barranco, P. M. Pizzochero, X. Roca-Maza, and E. Vigezzi Phys. Rev. C 108, 035808 (2023) – Published 18 September 2023 | | | Tyler C. Borgwardt, Richard James deBoer, Axel Boeltzig, Manoel Couder, Joachim Görres, August Gula, Mark Hanhardt, Khachatur V. Manukyan, Thomas Kadlecek, Daniel Robertson, Frank Strieder, and Michael Wiescher Phys. Rev. C 108, 035809 (2023) – Published 25 September 2023 | | | H. Güven, J. Margueron, K. Bozkurt, and E. Khan Phys. Rev. C 108, 035810 (2023) – Published 25 September 2023 | | | Y. Yamamoto, N. Yasutake, and Th. A. Rijken Phys. Rev. C 108, 035811 (2023) – Published 26 September 2023 | | | | |
No comments:
Post a Comment