Volume 109, Issue 2 February 2024 | | Advertisement | In this year, 2024, 156 Outstanding Referees were selected from the 91,600 currently active referees. The honorees come from over 42 different countries and will be recognized at the upcoming March Meeting. Read more. | | | | | | Advertisement Register today to attend April Meeting 2024! Discover groundbreaking research from Quarks to Cosmos, connect with new collaborators and longtime colleagues, and prepare for career success at April Meeting 2024. Learn more about pricing and attendance options. | | | | | Not an APS member? Join today to start connecting with a community of more than 50,000 physicists. | | | | Featured in Physics Vojtěch Horný, Sophia N. Chen, Xavier Davoine, Laurent Gremillet, and Julien Fuchs Phys. Rev. C 109, 025802 (2024) – Published 14 February 2024 | Laser-generated nucleosynthesis remains out of reach of present-day technology—but more powerful lasers could eventually make it possible. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion M. Companys Franzke, A. Tichai, K. Hebeler, and A. Schwenk Phys. Rev. C 109, 024311 (2024) – Published 13 February 2024 | This work reports on an emulator for the evaluation of many-body observables based on an eigenvector continuation (EC) framework as an example of a reduced-basis method for a detailed study of the exactly solvable pairing Hamiltonian that serves as a model for nuclear superfluidity. EC is established as a robust resummation tool for many-body perturbation theory even though the bare perturbative expansion breaks down. The authors obtain a reliable, computation-saving, description of the exact solution with a small number of training points, provided these are taken from both sides of the pairing phase transition. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion P. Sarriguren Phys. Rev. C 109, 024312 (2024) – Published 12 February 2024 | Deformation is a common property of nuclei, typically deduced from excitation spectra and γ-transition rates. Such deduction is more difficult for odd-A nuclei. In this paper, Sarriguren shows how one can use the interference between monopole and quadrupole Coulomb form factors in electron scattering off polarized odd-A nuclei to obtain detailed information on the quadrupole deformation, including its sign. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion D. D. Zhang, B. Li, D. Vretenar, T. Nikšić, Z. X. Ren, P. W. Zhao, and J. Meng Phys. Rev. C 109, 024316 (2024) – Published 13 February 2024 | Far away from the heaviest known nuclei, an island of relatively stable nuclei should exist in the nuclear chart. Reaching that island of stability requires a nuclear reaction that will transfer a large number of nucleons from one nucleus to another, such as in the collision of two actinide nuclei, which are heavy and already neutron-rich. In one particular collision scenario, ternary quasifission, the composite system formed by the two colliding nuclei is not in equilibrium, splitting into three fragments, instead of the more commonly observed binary fission process. The authors report a systematic study of ternary quasifission in 238U + 238U collisions in a microscopic framework that has been successfully applied to various nuclear phenomena. They find that including octupole deformation has a pronounced effect on the formation of the middle fragment. For tail-to-tail and tail-to-side collisions, the model calculations predict the formation of very heavy neutron-rich systems in certain energy intervals, a result that is potentially interesting for the synthesis of superheavy elements. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion O. Niţescu, R. Dvornický, and F. Šimkovic Phys. Rev. C 109, 025501 (2024) – Published 13 February 2024 | The shape of the spectrum of electrons emitted in β decay near the highest (endpoint) energy offers a direct way to determine the absolute values of neutrino masses. The authors reexamine one of the most promising candidates for determining the neutrino mass scale, the unique first-forbidden β transition from 187Re(5/2+) to 187Os(1/2−). Their results show that exchange effects between the emitted electrons and the atomic bound electrons can considerably impact the shape of the electron spectrum near the endpoint. The authors conclude that atomic effects, especially the exchange effect, should be considered in current and future investigations of the neutrino mass scale from β decays. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion Zifeng Luo (罗梓锋), M. Barbui, J. Bishop, G. Chubarian, V. Z. Goldberg, E. Harris, E. Koshchiy, C. E. Parker, M. Roosa, A. Saastamoinen, D. P. Scriven, and G. V. Rogachev Phys. Rev. C 109, 025801 (2024) – Published 13 February 2024 | In 1954 Fred Hoyle postulated that a 7.65 MeV excited state in 12C had to exist for carbon-based life to develop on Earth. During stellar helium burning, such a state allows a short-lived 8Be, formed from two α particles, to resonantly react with a third α particle to form this state which can decay to the 12C ground state via γ or electron-positron pair emission. The branching fraction for this radiative decay determines the amount of 12C produced in stars. A recent experiment suggested that the decay was significantly different from previous results from the 1960's and 1970's, adding considerable uncertainty to this important reaction. This paper uses modern detection technology to remeasure the branching ratio with reduced uncertainties compared with the new result and confirms that the earlier results were correct, thus significantly reducing the uncertainty in stellar 12C production. | | | | | | Letter Kathrin Kromer, Chunhai Lyu, Jacek Bieroń, Menno Door, Lucia Enzmann, Pavel Filianin, Gediminas Gaigalas, Zoltán Harman, Jost Herkenhoff, Wenjia Huang, Christoph H. Keitel, Sergey Eliseev, and Klaus Blaum Phys. Rev. C 109, L021301 (2024) – Published 6 February 2024 | | | Letter B. Hu and Q. B. Chen Phys. Rev. C 109, L021302 (2024) – Published 7 February 2024 | | | Letter K. Czerski, R. Dubey, M. Kaczmarski, A. Kowalska, N. Targosz-Ślęczka, G. Das Haridas, and M. Valat Phys. Rev. C 109, L021601 (2024) – Published 12 February 2024 | | | Letter Hui-Gan Cheng and Zhao-Qing Feng Phys. Rev. C 109, L021602 (2024) – Published 15 February 2024 | | | Letter W. Ye and N. Wang Phys. Rev. C 109, L021603 (2024) – Published 20 February 2024 | | | Letter Xiang Chen, Junping Yang, Ying Cui, Kai Zhao, Zhuxia Li, and Yingxun Zhang Phys. Rev. C 109, L021604 (2024) – Published 29 February 2024 | | | Letter R. Bhandari, G. Bollen, T. Brunner, N. D. Gamage, A. Hamaker, Z. Hockenbery, M. Horana Gamage, D. K. Keblbeck, K. G. Leach, D. Puentes, M. Redshaw, R. Ringle, S. Schwarz, C. S. Sumithrarachchi, and I. Yandow Phys. Rev. C 109, L022501 (2024) – Published 20 February 2024 | | | Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction, Few-Body Systems | D. Gazda, A. Pérez-Obiol, E. Friedman, and A. Gal Phys. Rev. C 109, 024001 (2024) – Published 6 February 2024 | | | Xincheng Lin Phys. Rev. C 109, 024002 (2024) – Published 20 February 2024 | | | M. Kohno, H. Kamada, and K. Miyagawa Phys. Rev. C 109, 024003 (2024) – Published 29 February 2024 | | | Shahariar Sarkar, P. K. Rath, V. Nanal, R. G. Pillay, Pushpendra P. Singh, Y. Iwata, K. Jha, and P. K. Raina Phys. Rev. C 109, 024301 (2024) – Published 1 February 2024 | | | I. C. S. Hay, P. D. Cottle, L. A. Riley, L. T. Baby, S. Baker, A. L. Conley, J. Esparza, K. Hanselman, M. Heinze, D. Houlihan, B. Kelly, K. W. Kemper, G. W. McCann, R. Renom, A. Sandrik, D. Simms, M. Spieker, and I. Wiedenhöver Phys. Rev. C 109, 024302 (2024) – Published 5 February 2024 | | | A. Petrovici Phys. Rev. C 109, 024303 (2024) – Published 6 February 2024 | | | D. Kumar, A. Pal, S. Basak, T. Bhattacharjee, S. S. Alam, L. Gerhard, L. Knafla, A. Esmaylzadeh, M. Ley, F. Dunkel, K. Schomaker, J.-M. Régis, J. Jolie, Y. H. Kim, and U. Köster Phys. Rev. C 109, 024304 (2024) – Published 6 February 2024 | | | Amandeep Kaur, Esra Yüksel, and Nils Paar Phys. Rev. C 109, 024305 (2024) – Published 6 February 2024 | | | Michel Poirier and Jean-Christophe Pain Phys. Rev. C 109, 024306 (2024) – Published 7 February 2024 | | | T. J. Gao, Jing-Bin Lu, Yingjun Ma, Yuhu Zhang, S. Q. Zhang, H. D. Wang, Jia-Qiang Liu, Pei-Yao Yang, Zhen Ren, Cheng-Qian Li, Q. B. Chen, Z. C. Gao, Jian Li, K. Y. Ma, and Guoxiang Dong Phys. Rev. C 109, 024307 (2024) – Published 7 February 2024 | | | Q. B. Chen Phys. Rev. C 109, 024308 (2024) – Published 8 February 2024 | | | S. Lalkovski, F. G. Kondev, K. Auranen, A. D. Ayangeakaa, M. P. Carpenter, J. A. Clark, P. Copp, N. P. Giha, D. J. Hartley, T. Lauritsen, S. Marley, G. E. Morgan, C. Müller-Gatermann, S. Nandi, W. Reviol, D. Santiago-Gonzalez, G. Savard, D. Seweryniak, Ir. B. Vasilev, and J. Wu Phys. Rev. C 109, 024309 (2024) – Published 8 February 2024 | | | X. H. Wu (吴鑫辉), C. Pan (潘琮), K. Y. Zhang (张开元), and J. Hu (胡进) Phys. Rev. C 109, 024310 (2024) – Published 8 February 2024 | | | Editors' Suggestion M. Companys Franzke, A. Tichai, K. Hebeler, and A. Schwenk Phys. Rev. C 109, 024311 (2024) – Published 13 February 2024 | This work reports on an emulator for the evaluation of many-body observables based on an eigenvector continuation (EC) framework as an example of a reduced-basis method for a detailed study of the exactly solvable pairing Hamiltonian that serves as a model for nuclear superfluidity. EC is established as a robust resummation tool for many-body perturbation theory even though the bare perturbative expansion breaks down. The authors obtain a reliable, computation-saving, description of the exact solution with a small number of training points, provided these are taken from both sides of the pairing phase transition. | | | | | | Editors' Suggestion P. Sarriguren Phys. Rev. C 109, 024312 (2024) – Published 12 February 2024 | Deformation is a common property of nuclei, typically deduced from excitation spectra and γ-transition rates. Such deduction is more difficult for odd-A nuclei. In this paper, Sarriguren shows how one can use the interference between monopole and quadrupole Coulomb form factors in electron scattering off polarized odd-A nuclei to obtain detailed information on the quadrupole deformation, including its sign. | | | | | | Nguyen Le Anh, Bui Minh Loc, Panagiota Papakonstantinou, and Naftali Auerbach Phys. Rev. C 109, 024313 (2024) – Published 12 February 2024 | | | J. Wu, M. P. Carpenter, F. G. Kondev, R. V. F. Janssens, S. Zhu, E. A. McCutchan, A. D. Ayangeakaa, J. Chen, J. Clark, D. J. Hartley, T. Lauritsen, N. Pietralla, G. Savard, D. Seweryniak, and V. Werner Phys. Rev. C 109, 024314 (2024) – Published 13 February 2024 | | | Leonid V. Skripnikov and Anatoly E. Barzakh Phys. Rev. C 109, 024315 (2024) – Published 14 February 2024 | | | Editors' Suggestion D. D. Zhang, B. Li, D. Vretenar, T. Nikšić, Z. X. Ren, P. W. Zhao, and J. Meng Phys. Rev. C 109, 024316 (2024) – Published 13 February 2024 | Far away from the heaviest known nuclei, an island of relatively stable nuclei should exist in the nuclear chart. Reaching that island of stability requires a nuclear reaction that will transfer a large number of nucleons from one nucleus to another, such as in the collision of two actinide nuclei, which are heavy and already neutron-rich. In one particular collision scenario, ternary quasifission, the composite system formed by the two colliding nuclei is not in equilibrium, splitting into three fragments, instead of the more commonly observed binary fission process. The authors report a systematic study of ternary quasifission in 238U + 238U collisions in a microscopic framework that has been successfully applied to various nuclear phenomena. They find that including octupole deformation has a pronounced effect on the formation of the middle fragment. For tail-to-tail and tail-to-side collisions, the model calculations predict the formation of very heavy neutron-rich systems in certain energy intervals, a result that is potentially interesting for the synthesis of superheavy elements. | | | | | | Kouhei Washiyama, Shuichiro Ebata, and Kenichi Yoshida Phys. Rev. C 109, 024317 (2024) – Published 14 February 2024 | | | Rozina Rahaman, Abhijit Bisoi, Ananya Das, Y. Sapkota, Arkabrata Gupta, S. Ray, S. Sarkar, Yashraj, A. Sharma, Bharti Rohila, I. Ahmed, Kaushik Katre, S. Dutt, S. Kumar, R. P. Singh, R. Kumar, and S. Muralithar Phys. Rev. C 109, 024318 (2024) – Published 15 February 2024 | | | A. Saracino, S. Zhu, N. Sensharma, A. D. Ayangeakaa, R. V. F. Janssens, Q. B. Chen, M. P. Carpenter, P. Chowdhury, A. Gade, F. G. Kondev, T. M. Kowalewski, T. Lauritsen, E. A. McCutchan, and D. Seweryniak Phys. Rev. C 109, 024319 (2024) – Published 16 February 2024 | | | S. V. Radionov Phys. Rev. C 109, 024320 (2024) – Published 20 February 2024 | | | A. Taninah, B. Osei, A. V. Afanasjev, U. C. Perera, and S. Teeti Phys. Rev. C 109, 024321 (2024) – Published 23 February 2024 | | | X. Yin, C. Ma, and Y. M. Zhao Phys. Rev. C 109, 024322 (2024) – Published 23 February 2024 | | | A. Zec, S. Premathilake, J. C. Cornejo, M. M. Dalton, C. Gal, D. Gaskell, M. Gericke, I. Halilovic, H. Liu, J. Mammei, R. Michaels, C. Palatchi, J. Pan, K. D. Paschke, B. Quinn, and J. Zhang Phys. Rev. C 109, 024323 (2024) – Published 23 February 2024 | | | Huai-Tong Xue (薛怀通), Q. B. Chen (陈启博), Ji-Wei Cui (崔继伟), C.-F. Chen (陈超锋), H.-J. Schulze, and Xian-Rong Zhou (周先荣) Phys. Rev. C 109, 024324 (2024) – Published 23 February 2024 | | | F. von Spee, M. Beckers, A. Blazhev, A. Dewald, F. Dunkel, A. Esmaylzadeh, C. Fransen, G. Hackenberg, J. Jolie, L. Knafla, C.-D. Lakenbrink, M. Schiffer, N. Warr, and M. Weinert Phys. Rev. C 109, 024325 (2024) – Published 23 February 2024 | | | Yi-Heng Wu, Jing-Bin Lu, Zhen Ren, Guan-Jian Fu, Cheng-Qian Li, Pei-Yao Yang, Yan Hao, Tian-Jiao Gao, Li-Hua Zhu, Xing-Zhu Cui, Xiao-Guang Wu, and Chuang-Ye He Phys. Rev. C 109, 024326 (2024) – Published 26 February 2024 | | | Yann Beaujeault-Taudière and Denis Lacroix Phys. Rev. C 109, 024327 (2024) – Published 27 February 2024 | | | Zepeng Gao, Siyu Liu, Peiwei Wen, Zehong Liao, Yu Yang, Jun Su, Yongjia Wang, and Long Zhu Phys. Rev. C 109, 024601 (2024) – Published 5 February 2024 | | | H. Eslamizadeh Phys. Rev. C 109, 024602 (2024) – Published 5 February 2024 | | | Kyoungsu Heo, Myung-Ki Cheoun, Ki-Seok Choi, K. S. Kim, and W. Y. So Phys. Rev. C 109, 024603 (2024) – Published 8 February 2024 | | | Zhilong Li, Zepeng Gao, Ling Liu, Yongjia Wang, Long Zhu, and Qingfeng Li Phys. Rev. C 109, 024604 (2024) – Published 8 February 2024 | | | J. Song, G. Savard, J. Greene, and J. A. Nolen Phys. Rev. C 109, 024605 (2024) – Published 12 February 2024 | | | Li-Lin Zhou, Jun-Jun Cai, Lu-Qi Li, Zi-Long Wang, Rui Zhu, Xiao-Ye Zhang, Xin-Rui Zhang, Long Zhu, Gen Zhang, and Feng-Shou Zhang Phys. Rev. C 109, 024606 (2024) – Published 13 February 2024 | | | A. K. Nurmukhanbetova, V. Z. Goldberg, A. Volya, D. K. Nauruzbayev, G. E. Serikbayeva, and G. V. Rogachev Phys. Rev. C 109, 024607 (2024) – Published 13 February 2024 | | | J. García-Marcos, T. Franco-Munoz, R. González-Jiménez, A. Nikolakopoulos, N. Jachowicz, and J. M. Udías Phys. Rev. C 109, 024608 (2024) – Published 13 February 2024 | | | Riichi Kuwahara, Kaoru Ohno, and Tsutomu Ohtsuki Phys. Rev. C 109, 024609 (2024) – Published 15 February 2024 | | | Reddi Rani L., N. Sowmya, H. C. Manjunatha, K. N. Sridhar, and M. M. Armstrong Arasu Phys. Rev. C 109, 024610 (2024) – Published 15 February 2024 | | | R. A. Gherghescu, H. Stoecker, and D. N. Poenaru Phys. Rev. C 109, 024611 (2024) – Published 15 February 2024 | | | O. N. Ghodsi, M. Morshedloo, and M. M. Amiri Phys. Rev. C 109, 024612 (2024) – Published 15 February 2024 | | | Avazbek Nasirov and Bakhodir Kayumov Phys. Rev. C 109, 024613 (2024) – Published 20 February 2024 | | | D. D. Zhang, D. Vretenar, T. Nikšić, P. W. Zhao, and J. Meng Phys. Rev. C 109, 024614 (2024) – Published 21 February 2024 | | | I. Ciraldo et al. (NUMEN collaboration) Phys. Rev. C 109, 024615 (2024) – Published 22 February 2024 | | | Meng-Qi Ding (丁梦琦), De-Qing Fang (方德清), and Yu-Gang Ma (马余刚) Phys. Rev. C 109, 024616 (2024) – Published 26 February 2024 | | | F. C. Dai, P. W. Wen, C. J. Lin, J. J. Liu, X. X. Xu, K. L. Wang, H. M. Jia, L. Yang, N. R. Ma, and F. Yang Phys. Rev. C 109, 024617 (2024) – Published 26 February 2024 | | | Relativistic Nuclear Collisions | Jiaxing Zhao and Shuzhe Shi Phys. Rev. C 109, 024901 (2024) – Published 5 February 2024 | | | Yong Zhang and Peng Ru Phys. Rev. C 109, 024902 (2024) – Published 5 February 2024 | | | Sylwia Bazak and Stanisław Mrówczyński Phys. Rev. C 109, 024903 (2024) – Published 6 February 2024 | | | Sarthak Satapathy, Sudipan De, Jayanta Dey, and Sabyasachi Ghosh Phys. Rev. C 109, 024904 (2024) – Published 6 February 2024 | | | Siddhartha Solanki, Manohar Lal, Rishabh Sharma, and Vineet Kumar Agotiya Phys. Rev. C 109, 024905 (2024) – Published 6 February 2024 | | | Niseem Magdy Phys. Rev. C 109, 024906 (2024) – Published 7 February 2024 | | | R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration) Phys. Rev. C 109, 024907 (2024) – Published 13 February 2024 | | | Heikki Mäntysaari, Farid Salazar, Björn Schenke, Chun Shen, and Wenbin Zhao Phys. Rev. C 109, 024908 (2024) – Published 12 February 2024 | | | Bang-Xiang Chen (陈帮祥), Xin-Li Zhao (赵新丽), and Guo-Liang Ma (马国亮) Phys. Rev. C 109, 024909 (2024) – Published 13 February 2024 | | | Oleh Savchuk and Scott Pratt Phys. Rev. C 109, 024910 (2024) – Published 14 February 2024 | | | Ilia Grishmanovskii, Olga Soloveva, Taesoo Song, Carsten Greiner, and Elena Bratkovskaya Phys. Rev. C 109, 024911 (2024) – Published 15 February 2024 | | | Ting-Ting Wang (王婷婷), Yu-Gang Ma (马余刚), and Song Zhang (张松) Phys. Rev. C 109, 024912 (2024) – Published 15 February 2024 | | | Juhee Hong Phys. Rev. C 109, 024913 (2024) – Published 20 February 2024 | | | A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration) Phys. Rev. C 109, 024914 (2024) – Published 23 February 2024 | | | S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration) Phys. Rev. C 109, 024915 (2024) – Published 23 February 2024 | | | Shin-ei Fujii and Tetsufumi Hirano Phys. Rev. C 109, 024916 (2024) – Published 27 February 2024 | | | Arpita Mondal and Amruta Mishra Phys. Rev. C 109, 025201 (2024) – Published 2 February 2024 | | | J. J. Cobos-Martínez and Kazuo Tsushima Phys. Rev. C 109, 025202 (2024) – Published 12 February 2024 | | | Xin-Jian Wen and Jia Zhang Phys. Rev. C 109, 025203 (2024) – Published 12 February 2024 | | | Hui-Yun Cao and Hai-Qing Zhou Phys. Rev. C 109, 025204 (2024) – Published 13 February 2024 | | | Kaito Noro, Wolfgang Bentz, Ian C. Cloët, and Teruyuki Kitabayashi Phys. Rev. C 109, 025205 (2024) – Published 15 February 2024 | | | Renan Câmara Pereira, Pedro Costa, Constança Providência, and João Moreira Phys. Rev. C 109, 025206 (2024) – Published 20 February 2024 | | | Electroweak Interaction, Symmetries | Editors' Suggestion O. Niţescu, R. Dvornický, and F. Šimkovic Phys. Rev. C 109, 025501 (2024) – Published 13 February 2024 | The shape of the spectrum of electrons emitted in β decay near the highest (endpoint) energy offers a direct way to determine the absolute values of neutrino masses. The authors reexamine one of the most promising candidates for determining the neutrino mass scale, the unique first-forbidden β transition from 187Re(5/2+) to 187Os(1/2−). Their results show that exchange effects between the emitted electrons and the atomic bound electrons can considerably impact the shape of the electron spectrum near the endpoint. The authors conclude that atomic effects, especially the exchange effect, should be considered in current and future investigations of the neutrino mass scale from β decays. | | | | | | J. E. Sobczyk, B. Acharya, S. Bacca, and G. Hagen Phys. Rev. C 109, 025502 (2024) – Published 20 February 2024 | | | Editors' Suggestion Zifeng Luo (罗梓锋), M. Barbui, J. Bishop, G. Chubarian, V. Z. Goldberg, E. Harris, E. Koshchiy, C. E. Parker, M. Roosa, A. Saastamoinen, D. P. Scriven, and G. V. Rogachev Phys. Rev. C 109, 025801 (2024) – Published 13 February 2024 | In 1954 Fred Hoyle postulated that a 7.65 MeV excited state in 12C had to exist for carbon-based life to develop on Earth. During stellar helium burning, such a state allows a short-lived 8Be, formed from two α particles, to resonantly react with a third α particle to form this state which can decay to the 12C ground state via γ or electron-positron pair emission. The branching fraction for this radiative decay determines the amount of 12C produced in stars. A recent experiment suggested that the decay was significantly different from previous results from the 1960's and 1970's, adding considerable uncertainty to this important reaction. This paper uses modern detection technology to remeasure the branching ratio with reduced uncertainties compared with the new result and confirms that the earlier results were correct, thus significantly reducing the uncertainty in stellar 12C production. | | | | | | Featured in Physics Vojtěch Horný, Sophia N. Chen, Xavier Davoine, Laurent Gremillet, and Julien Fuchs Phys. Rev. C 109, 025802 (2024) – Published 14 February 2024 | Laser-generated nucleosynthesis remains out of reach of present-day technology—but more powerful lasers could eventually make it possible. | | | | | | R. Rizaldy and A. Sulaksono Phys. Rev. C 109, 025803 (2024) – Published 14 February 2024 | | | Sk Md Adil Imam, Arunava Mukherjee, B. K. Agrawal, and Gourab Banerjee Phys. Rev. C 109, 025804 (2024) – Published 16 February 2024 | | | Prashant Thakur, B. K. Sharma, A. Ashika, S. Srivishnu, and T. K. Jha Phys. Rev. C 109, 025805 (2024) – Published 21 February 2024 | | | R. Shafieepour, H. R. Moshfegh, and J. Piekarewicz Phys. Rev. C 109, 025806 (2024) – Published 23 February 2024 | | | Peter T. H. Pang, Lars Sivertsen, Rahul Somasundaram, Tim Dietrich, Srimoyee Sen, Ingo Tews, Michael W. Coughlin, and Chris Van Den Broeck Phys. Rev. C 109, 025807 (2024) – Published 28 February 2024 | | | R. N. Sahoo, M. Paul, Y. Kashiv, M. Tessler, M. Friedman, S. Halfon, A. Kreisel, A. Shor, and L. Weissman Phys. Rev. C 109, 025808 (2024) – Published 29 February 2024 | | | G. Aad and et al. (ATLAS Collaboration) Phys. Rev. C 109, 029901 (2024) – Published 20 February 2024 | | | E. H. Wang et al. Phys. Rev. C 109, 029902 (2024) – Published 21 February 2024 | | | T. Okudaira, S. Takada, K. Hirota, A. Kimura, M. Kitaguchi, J. Koga, K. Nagamoto, T. Nakao, A. Okada, K. Sakai, H. M. Shimizu, T. Yamamoto, and T. Yoshioka Phys. Rev. C 109, 029903 (2024) – Published 26 February 2024 | | | Sota Yoshida, Yutaka Utsuno, Noritaka Shimizu, and Takaharu Otsuka Phys. Rev. C 109, 029904 (2024) – Published 26 February 2024 | | | | |
No comments:
Post a Comment